close this window
Putting Climate Researchers Under the Microscope
Scientists who argue for human-caused climate change published twice as many papers and are cited 64 percent more often than researchers who doubt climate change.
In a first-of-its-kind study, a team of Stanford University scientists have analyzed the papers published and cited by more than 900 climate researchers. Using the same metrics universities employ for making hiring or tenure decisions, the paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that researchers who doubt climate change have less expertise and are far less prominent than their colleagues: Scientists who argue for human-caused climate change published twice as many papers and were cited about 64 percent more often than the unconvinced.
Still … the researchers aren’t expecting their findings will exactly, um, convince anyone.
In This Issue
Lobbying doesn’t usually work; fat won’t kill you; and the Dead Sea doesn’t need to die. Check out those stories, our cover story on oxytocin shaking up the field of economics and much more in the September-October 2010 issue of Miller-McCune magazine.
“I think the most typical criticism of a paper like this — not necessarily in academic discourse, but in the broader context — is going to be that we haven’t addressed if these sorts of differences could be due to some sort of clique or, at the extreme, a conspiracy of the researchers who are convinced of climate change,” said lead author William Anderegg, choosing his words carefully because he was still clad in his Masonic robes. “If you were a young researcher and had the data to overturn any of the mainstream paradigms, or what the (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has done, you would become absolutely famous. Everyone wants to be the next Darwin, everyone wants to be the next Einstein.”
Not everyone, Anderegg. Some just want to be the next Ann Coulter.
Looking for a little light reading?
Try “Nuns, Dykes, Drugs and Gendered Bodies: An Autoethnography of a Lesbian Feminist’s Journey Through ‘Good Time’ Sociology” by the University of Liverpool’s Elizabeth Ettorre in the June issue of Sexualities. Admit it: You didn’t even know there was such a thing as “good time” sociology, did you?
The Cocktail Napkin appears at the back page of each issue of Miller-McCune magazine, highlighting current research that merits a raised eyebrow or a painful grin.
word on the street
more in this section
Women Eye Dance Moves to Find Thrill Seekers
Does This Make My Antenna Look Big?
As if Commercials Weren’t Bad Enough Already
The Exploitation of Muggles in Harry Potter’s World
New Dinosaur Gets a Rather Large Name
Time for Robin Hood to Make a Comeback
Standing in Alcohol Won’t Get You Drunk
College Guys Will Remember the Pretty Ones
Next They’ll Tell Us Germs Can Dance
Debunking Theories of a Terrorist Power Grab
also by this author
Matt PalmquistA graduate of Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism, Matt Palmquist, a former Miller-McCune staff writer, began his career at daily ne...
Researchers Tackle the ‘Hipster’ PhenomenonResearchers tap the indie marketplace to learn more about hipsters, who don’t think of themselves as hipsters despite their obvious hipsterness.
Study: Canadian Parents Enforce Fewer RulesIn comparison to French and Italian parents, Canadians deemed most tolerant, according to study.
Use the Phone While Driving, Get DumpedStudy says using a cell phone while driving causes communication breakdowns that could cause misunderstandings and hurt relationships.
World Press Photos in FocusReady for a close-up: The year in award-winning photojournalism presented by the World Press Photo Exhibition.
Get Plenty of Sleep Before Imitating Rock GodsPaper reveals that players of a popular video game increase their performance when they’ve had a full night of rest.
Receive 1 year (6 issues) of our print magazine for just $14.95. Miller-McCune features polished, in-depth reports on research and solutions across the policy spectrum — from health care, education and energy to international affairs, poverty and the global economy. It's a must read for well-informed and solutions-driven individuals.
follow us on:
join our newsletter:
from the source
The wage gap between the sexes in America has been closing much faster than anyone realized, but that’s tempered by learning it’s been much wider than measurements had shown.
An effort to identify five performing orcas as slaves failed in part, argues one scholar, because there’s no legal precedent establishing them as persons.
New research finds listeners judge symphonic music differently when they’re told the conductor is a woman.
Transportation used to be one of the few guaranteed areas of agreement when ideology trumped pragmatism in D.C. But that’s no longer the case.
New research suggests less-creative people do more innovative thinking when they are told individualism is the norm, and instructed to conform.
