close this window
What About Spilled Oil That Doesn’t Reach Shore?
Scientists studying ‘natural’ oil spills fear for a sea floor about to be overwhelmed by detritus from the BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
As the oily goo from the massive spill in the Gulf of Mexico begins to come ashore, the immediate concern is for the devastating effects it will have on the shore birds and sea life in the coastal regions. But what of the long-term effects on the ocean itself?
David Valentine, a biologist with the University of California, Santa Barbara, worries as much about the effects of the hundreds of thousands of gallons of crude settling on the sea floor, where much of the gushing oil is likely to settle.
While the obvious immediate danger is to the coastal areas — and oil has already started to wash up on island beaches at the Breton National Wildlife Refuge and other areas off the Mississippi and Louisiana coasts — Valentine said there should be equal concern for the shallow shelf waters and, ultimately, the deep-sea floor.
Valentine has been studying oil deposits in the Santa Barbara Channel off the California coast for more than 10 years, focusing on the organisms that eat petroleum and tars that seep naturally out of the channel floor. More than 100 barrels (or 4,200 gallons) of oil a day ooze from seeps just 2 miles offshore, and much of it ends up on Santa Barbara’s beaches. It’s been described as a “permanent natural oil spill.”
Valentine and his co-investigator, Chris Reddy of Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute in Massachusetts, two years ago reported the discovery of microscopic creatures that eat oil on the sea floor.
“It takes a special organism to live a half mile deep in the earth and eat oil for a living,” Valentine said. “It’s actually a whole consortium of organisms — some that are eating the oil and producing intermediate products, and then those intermediate products are converted by another group to natural gas.”

This illustration shows the route traveled by oil leaving the sub-seafloor reservoir as it travels through the water column to the surface and ultimately falls back to the seafloor. The oil remaining after weathering falls in a plume shape onto the seafloor where it remains in the sediment. Click to enlarge. (Jack Cook, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution)
Also, because the deep ocean is an anaerobic environment, and very cold, the breakdown process is much slower than would happen with, for example, bioremediation, where organisms that eat oil are sprayed on slicks to break them down naturally. (Take a look at a look at the work of environmental microbiologist Terry Hazen here.)
But the spill in the Gulf of Mexico is on a scale that overwhelms the organisms that would typically digest it, Valentine explained.
“It’s really a matter of amount, of how much ends up depositing on the sea floor. You’ve got micro-organisms that are capable of consuming components of the oil, but they are finicky. They’re not a magic bullet by any sense, and they act on their own time frame.”
In the case of the Gulf spill, there’s too much oil, and it’s happened too fast.
“It’s just overwhelming the capacity of biology to deal with it. The longer the oil stays afloat, the better off it’s going to be,” Valentine said.
In addition to the oil’s impact, he worries about the potential effects of the surfactant — essentially a detergent — that is being sprayed on the slicks and pumped into the Gulf to break up the oil. Because the surfactant’s chemical makeup is a proprietary mixture, its exact makeup is not known, and Valentine worries how those chemicals will affect coastal wildlife and sea life over time.
One result of using dispersants is that thicker blobs of oil may be created extending under the surface, making tracking the oil far more difficult.
“It’s going to be a very interesting fallout pattern that comes from that. We need to know where. The beach is the place you really don’t want it. The next place you don’t want it is the shallow shelf. The place most people don’t care about is the deep water. I care about the organisms there that are likely to be impacted.”
The deep ocean is home to a rich assortment of organisms and creatures, including mussels, snails, crabs, shrimp, fish and large sea worms. Many live around deep-sea vents where extremes of temperature and pressure create difficult environments. How those colonies of life would be affected by blankets of thick crude is unknown.
“It certainly has the potential to impact the critters of the deep ocean. It may not have a big economic impact, but it will affect the ecosystems,” Valentine said.
Oil is made up of thousands of different hydrocarbons that can break down by the action of light, bacteria or oxygen into chemicals such as aldehydes, ketones or sulfur compounds. They can also become acids, and many are potentially toxic, Valentine said.
Valentine also studies methane hydrates, a solid ice that forms when methane contacts cold water under the intense pressure of the deep ocean. Methane hydrates are the reason that British Petroleum engineers encountered problems over the weekend while placing a collection tower over the ruptured pipeline. Methane hydrates are stable at low temperatures and high pressure, as at the ocean floor, but they coagulate — kind of like cholesterol in your veins — and in this case they simply clogged up the top of the containment structure, Valentine explained.
As soon as BP put the tower in place, the hole at the top of the tower became plugged, casting doubt on whether that proposed fix is viable. Meanwhile, the oil continues to spew out of the ruptured pipeline at a rate of about 5,000 barrels, or about 210,000 gallons, per day. At between 150 and 180 degrees Fahrenheit, it’s like a blistering Jacuzzi jet shooting into the open ocean, Valentine said.
Until someone figures out how to harness it, the devastation will continue, Valentine said.
“The reality is it could certainly go for months or even years.”
word on the street
- Teri Parenteay
more in this section
Quake Rescues Reserve, Shakes Baja Fishing Town
Children’s Books Increasingly Ignore Natural World
Conservation’s Earnest Message Could Use Levity
Traffic Solution: Make Drivers Less Lonely
Street Makeovers Put New Spin on the Block
New Dirt on Climate Change
Saving Whales by Putting a Price on Their Tail?
U.S. Planting Seeds of Peace in Afghanistan
Returning Warriors Go to Work, in the Fields
Leaky Homes Show Green Intentions Gone Wrong
also by this author
The Marijuana and Schizophrenia ConundrumThere’s a connection between marijuana and schizophrenia, and as scholars tease out the chicken-and-egg genetic aspect, they counsel teen tokers to take heed.
On the Road to Recovery with Fred FreseMental health care ‘consumers’ are taking a greater role in their own recovery, moving beyond merely being patients to being providers.
Apartment Complex Focuses on Mentally IllAs homelessness too often accompanies mental illness in the United States, one project tackles both issues.
Mental Illness Champions Found Down UnderAustralian government to spend $5 billion over five years to improve its mental health services.
Recovery Model Shows Promise in Helping Mentally IllSome programs show great promise — but they haven’t been propagated.

Receive 1 year (6 issues) of our print magazine for just $14.95. Miller-McCune features polished, in-depth reports on research and solutions across the policy spectrum — from health care, education and energy to international affairs, poverty and the global economy. It's a must read for well-informed and solutions-driven individuals.

follow us on:
from the source

The wage gap between the sexes in America has been closing much faster than anyone realized, but that’s tempered by learning it’s been much wider than measurements had shown.

An effort to identify five performing orcas as slaves failed in part, argues one scholar, because there’s no legal precedent establishing them as persons.

New research finds listeners judge symphonic music differently when they’re told the conductor is a woman.

Transportation used to be one of the few guaranteed areas of agreement when ideology trumped pragmatism in D.C. But that’s no longer the case.

New research suggests less-creative people do more innovative thinking when they are told individualism is the norm, and instructed to conform.







