more in this section
The Balance of Evil-Doing: Kiri’s Impacts
You Can’t Paper Over the Plastic
Resurrecting the Dead Sea
Can Mining Provide a Renewable Energy Future?
Clearing the Air on States’ Rights
Sustainable Tourism en masse: Huatulco’s Attempt
Charles Harvey: Water Detective
Putting Climate Researchers Under the Microscope
Artists of Restoration at Playa Viva
Ice Capades At the Ends of the Earth
also by this author
Melinda Burns
Melinda Burns was previously a senior writer for the Santa Barbara News-Press, covering immigration, urban planning, science and the environment. Amon...
Cops and College: Do Police Need Book Smarts?
Better-educated police officers resort less often to using force, research shows.
K Street and the Status Quo
An unprecedented 10-year study’s surprising verdict: The real outcome of most lobbying is … nothing. Until the right party or person comes to power.
No More Dozing Off in First Period
An 8:30 a.m. high school start time helps students get more sleep, stay alert in class, a pilot study finds.
Clean Energy and the U.S. Handicap: One Man’s Story
On-again, off-again federal support cripples emerging industries in the United States, America’s pre-eminent wind energy pioneer believes.
Smartest Girls Find Gender Gap in Math, Science
At the highest levels of academic ability among seventh-grade students, boys still outnumber girls by more than 3-to-1 in math and science, a study finds.
Mixed Messages on Green Homes
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac try to block a municipal program that makes solar roofs affordable for homeowners.
Locally Owned Wind Power: Quaint it Ain’t
The financial crisis is a blessing in disguise for community wind power, an underserved sector of the burgeoning U.S. wind industry. And turbines are giving old farms a second wind.
The Poverty Solution: Cash
A new book, “Just Give Money to the Poor,” says the poor will spend the cash wisely and boost the economy, too.
‘Courts and Kids’ Argues for Equal School Funding
State courts should stand firm on equal school funding and make sure legislators and governors show kids the money, a law scholar writes.
List of Neglected Tropical Diseases
Almost everyone in the world’s “bottom billion” has at least one of a dozen or so tropical diseases that mostly ignored by Western medicine and pharmaceutical companies.
Receive 1 year (6 issues) of our print magazine for just $24.95. Miller-McCune features polished, in-depth reports on research and solutions across the policy spectrum — from health care, education and energy to international affairs, poverty and the global economy. It's a must read for well-informed and solutions-driven individuals.
close this window
The Story of P(ee)
In which phosphorus, a substance present in every living cell, is being used up and flushed away.
“P” is for phosphorus, the stuff of life, and “p” is for “peak phosphorus” by 2030, ecologists say, unless — presto! — pee can be turned into gold through modern-day alchemy.
Unremarked and unregulated by the United Nations and other high-level assemblies, the world’s supply of phosphate rock, the dominant source of phosphorus for fertilizer, is being rapidly — and wastefully — drawn down. By most estimates, the best deposits will be gone in 50 to 100 years.
Worse, phosphorus production could peak in just two decades, according to new research from Australia and Sweden. That’s when demand could outstrip supply, playing out a familiar scenario of scarcity, price shocks, riots, starvation and war.
In short, peak phosphorus could be the unwelcome sequel to peak oil.
“It’s an emerging crisis,” said Stuart White, director of the Institute for Sustainable Futures at the University of Technology in Sydney, Australia, and a co-author of two phosphorus studies published recently by Global Environmental Change and the International Conference on Nutrient Recovery from Wastewater Streams.
“Right now, you can get phosphorus if you’re willing to pay for it,” White said. “But global reserves will peak in 20 to 25 years. Africa has not stirred in terms of its phosphorus use. Africa could take off, and that’s very scary.
“We will continue to mine phosphorus. It’s just that if we want to extend the longevity of the resource, we’ll have to reduce extraction rates significantly and put in much bigger recycling.”
P in DNA
Peak phosphorus, as White and his colleagues describe it, based on data from the U.S. Geological Survey and the fertilizer industry, makes peak oil look like a cakewalk.
Both oil and phosphate rock are finite, non-renewable fossil resources that were created in deep geological time, whether from decaying biomass for oil or millennia of pooping seabirds for phosphate. But there are substitutes for oil; there is no substitute for phosphorus, an element that forms bones, sustains cell membranes and gives shape to the DNA and RNA in all living things.
“We are effectively addicted to phosphate rock,” said Dana Cordell, a Ph.D. candidate who works with White and co-authored the recent studies. Cordell’s thesis, The Story of Phosphorus: Sustainable Implications of Global Phosphorus Scarcity for Food Security, was published as an e-book by Linköping University in Sweden on Feb. 4.
“The quality of the remaining phosphate rock is declining,” Cordell said. “We’re going to have to shift away from our use of it. There is no single quick fix solution.”
Worldwide, according to Cordell and White, five times more phosphorus is being mined than is being consumed. Stated another way, 15 million tons of phosphorus is mined yearly to grow food, but 80 percent never reaches the dinner table: It is lost to inefficiency and waste.
Farmers use too much fertilizer and it runs off the land, polluting streams, lakes and oceans. Industrial agriculture does not plow crop residues back into the soil after the harvest. In some countries, consumers throw away a third of their food, even when much of it is still edible.
Mature animals, including humans, excrete nearly 100 percent of the phosphorus they consume. But only half of animal manure — the largest organic and renewable source of phosphorus — is being recycled back onto farmland worldwide, studies show. And only 10 percent of what humans excrete is returned to agriculture as sludge or wastewater.
“We need to start talking about our pee and poo more seriously,” Cordell said. “We need to be thinking in terms of 50 to 100 years.”
In 2008, as the price of phosphorus skyrocketed from $50 to $400 per ton, Cordell, White and other scientists in Australia, Sweden, Canada and the Netherlands formed the Global Phosphorus Research Initiative. The group hopes to capture the attention of the U.N. by holding an international workshop Feb. 25 and 26 in Linköping.
“Phosphorus is an issue without a home,” White said. “It falls in the cracks between nations.”
The ABC’s of P
Here’s President Franklin D. Roosevelt, addressing the Congress in 1938:
I cannot over-emphasize the importance of phosphorus not only to agriculture and soil conservation but also to the physical health and economic security of the people of the nation.
Without phosphorus, the world cannot grow food. Yet only three countries control 73 percent of the world’s remaining known reserves of phosphate rock. By contrast, the 13 members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries control 75 percent of known oil reserves.
The U.S. now has only a 25-year supply left of phosphate rock, most of it is in Florida and North Carolina, studies show. China has the largest reserves — 27 percent of the total — but has clamped down on exports with a steep tariff. Morocco is occupying the Western Sahara and its reserves and is exporting them to the U.S, even as the U.N. condemns the trade.
Africa is now both the largest exporter of phosphate rock and the continent with the worst food shortages.
“We’re calling this the biggest problem no one’s heard of,” said James Elser, an Arizona State University ecologist who recently co-founded the Sustainable Phosphorus Initiative, a new research group on campus. (Arizona State will send representatives to the conference in Sweden this month, and next year, the university plans to host the second international summit on phosphorus.)
“The scope and urgency of the time scale need to be narrowed down,” Elser said. “I don’t think we have a really good consensus about the peak. Is this really an acute problem in 30 years? If this is true, then the human consequences are much more acute than anything we’ve seen with climate change, in terms of hunger. Food is food. We can’t live without it.”
By some estimates, peak phosphorus is already past. In a 2007 paper in Energy Bulletin, Canadian physicist Patrick Déry and co-author Bart Anderson hypothesized that global reserves of phosphate rock peaked in 1989.
“Phosphorus may be the real bottleneck of agriculture,” they said, echoing a phrase from Isaac Asimov, a biochemist as well as science fiction writer, who called it “life’s bottleneck.”
White and Cordell dispute the 1989 date for peak phosphorus, saying that an apparent production decline in phosphorus after that year was only temporary: It was caused by the breakup of the Soviet Union and the saturation of fertilizer in European soils. In any case, they say, whenever the peak, the cost of production is indisputably going up and the quality of phosphate rock is declining.
“It’s generally true that the data is very poor on the reserves,” White said. “All it goes to show is that we can’t really know definitely. But the principle remains.”
P and the 3 R’s
In Dune, his 1965 sci-fi classic, Frank Herbert imagines a futuristic empire at war over spice, a life-extending drug that is mined for interstellar travel. Spice is the most essential and most valuable commodity in the universe, and Dune chronicles the struggle for the desert planet Arrakis, the only place where spice is found.
Unfortunately, peak phosphorus is not science fiction.
Mark Edwards, a food marketing expert at Arizona State, believes that water and phosphorus are the two most critical problems for world food supply. Last year, in the course of writing a book on the crisis in world agriculture, titled, Crash! The Demise of Fossil Food and the Rise of Abundance, Edwards said he “did the math” and realized that phosphorus was running out.
Crash! contains a doomsday scenario for a “resource run” on phosphorus, complete with rumor, speculation, hoarding, guarded mines, restricted exports, high prices, bankrupt farmers and a hysterical press.
Edwards co-founded the Arizona State phosphorus initiative because, he said, “I wanted to verify that my math was correct. I was hoping it was wrong. I want to help farmers recover their waste nutrients.
“Phosphorus is way under the radar for everybody. Most scientists just aren’t aware of it.”
Phosphorus cannot be manufactured or synthesized in a lab. The only way to avert a supply crisis, researchers say, is to adopt the “3 R’s” of sustainability: “Reduce, Reuse and Recycle.”
For starters, they say, reducing demand means bucking a global trend and deliberately choosing to eat less meat. Meat- and dairy-based diets require up to three times as much phosphorus as vegetarian diets.
If the Western world switched en masse to a vegetarian diet, it could lower the world demand for phosphorus in fertilizers by as much as 45 percent, the studies show. If, on the other hand, Indians switched to a meat-based diet, it would triple India’s demand for phosphorus.
“It goes to the heart of what people see as affluence,” White said. “Can we afford to have 9 billion people in 2050 eating as high on the food chain as Americans and Australians do? The answer, clearly, is no. As Gandhi said, ‘There’s enough for everyone’s need but not for everyone’s greed.’
“It’s not for me to tell other people what they should eat. But people in Western industrial countries have a choice. There is no need to eat meat.”
Reuse and recycling are possible because, unlike oil, phosphorus can be recovered after it is used. For thousands of years, farmers did just that, plowing manure and human “night soil” back onto the land. In modern-day agriculture, however, animal feed lots are often thousands of miles away from the fields, and toilets flush away human waste.
Phosphorus cannot be destroyed, but it is becoming dissipated in the environment, Elser said. What’s lost today to rivers and oceans will take another 10 to 15 million years to become phosphate rock on dry land, as happened on now depleted “phosphate islands” like the down-on-its-luck nation of Nauru.
“There’s a whole industry that needs to be invented to capture phosphorus,” Elser said. “We need a new way of growing crops that keeps it in the field instead of letting it run down into the Gulf of Mexico. We need plants that are more efficient at getting phosphorus.
“We’re calling it ‘closing the human-phosphorus cycle.’”
Ideally, researchers say, cities will become phosphorus “hotspots” of urine and feces that can fertilize the surrounding farmland. Sweden for example, plans to recycle 60 percent of its phosphorus back into agriculture by 2015. Two Swedish cities presently require all new toilets to separate urine for use on local farms. The nutrients in one person’s urine are believed to be sufficient to produce at least half and potentially all the food requirements for another person.
Using collected human waste as a source of otherwise hard to obtain chemicals like phosphorus dates back at least to Nero’s “urine tax,” while alchemists in Europe routinely decanted urine to refine elemental phosphorus for their experiments.
Society’s prevailing view of wastewater as a pollutant and not a resource has been called “urine blindness.” Victor Hugo, the French novelist, saw it coming, various phosphorus studies have recalled. As he wrote in Les Miserables not long after the introduction of flush toilets in the mid 19th century:
Thanks to human dung, the earth in China is still as young as in the days of Abraham. Chinese wheat yields a hundredfold of the seed. There is no guano comparable in fertility with the detritus of a capital. A great city is the most mighty of dung-makers. Certain success would attend the experiment of employing the city to manure the plain. If our gold is manure, our manure, on the other hand, is gold.
Sign up for our free e-newsletter.
Are you on Facebook? Become our fan.
Follow us on Twitter.
word on the street
Leave a Reply
search
follow us on:

from the source
Do School Lunches Plump Up Poor Kids?
A program to ensure all American children get at least one good meal a day may lie behind their expanding waistlines. Oddly, a breakfast program does not.
An Emotional Timeline of Sept. 11, 2001
German researchers, analyzing the content of text messages sent on 9/11/01, report that while sadness and anxiety levels remained stable through the day, anger steadily increased.
Liberals Gone Wild
A short digression on the meaning of a word that apparently has no generally agreed-upon political definition.
Volunteer Work Prolongs Lives of Frail Elderly
New research finds that among the elderly, functional limitations are associated with an increased risk of dying — but only for those who don’t do volunteer work.
Public Schools: An Untapped Recreational Resource
Researchers suggest limiting liability issues to make playgrounds and other recreation areas on school grounds accessible as a cost-effective way to promote public health.





I guess it boils down to the real world efficiency of recycling P from wastes in each "step" of food production and consumption. I am going to assume that as many things in real world are not 100 percent, even just a minute quantity of P is going to be unrecoverable at every stage. Of course this tiny waste wouldn't spell our doom because we may just as well find ways of extracting the small difference from the sea where it ends up washing away too.
But back to meat vs. veg, If you lose a little in each step, the more steps means more is lost. Since raising meat takes the extra "step" of growing feed and then caring for and breeding the animals themselves, that might result in quite an amount of P waste even in a very efficient recycling scheme compared to vegetables which go from field to plate.
this wouldn't post when I tried before.____D. Locke,____You seem determined not to speak truth but to moan and complain about vegetarians and be snide to people for having beliefs and wanting to help others. While I enjoy a good witty remark, yours are, well, not that enjoyable. Why not confine your comments to the ignorant fat cowboy industrial meat websites, where I'm sure they'll be more appreciated?____The reasons for eating less meat are well-supported
Demosthenes Locke : You must be a troll or don't have the brain you so claim to have. The whole point is that the production of meat requires more phosphorus. If everyone were vegetarian, less phosphorus would be needed to keep the human race alive. It's really a very simple point.
The part that bothers me about all of this is simply that phosphorus, if in short supply, is not priced appropriately. Our food, especially meat, should thus be more expensive. Is the market not correctly setting the price due to government subsidies? Or is something else going on? If meat were that much more expensive, people would change their behaviour. Also, the production of food and use of phosphorus would be made more efficient due to the high cost of the fertilizer. The market can help to fix this, but we need to find out who is breaking it where.
To the 3 Rs you should add another P–for Permaculture. With its creation of ecological plant communities (and the integration of animals) it uses plants that delve deeply and accumulate minerals that can then be used by other plants. The 3 sisters of native Americans are an example–corn, beans and squash, and sometimes other plants.Other P accumulators are buckwheat, clover, comfrey, fennel, mustards, marigold, canola, sorrel, thistles, vetches, walnut, watercress and yarrow, etc. and I'm sure sufficient research would reveal more. (from Toby Hemenway, Gaia's Garden p132)
Ah, yes, the cry of the vegetarian to give up meat, and the specious "scientific" reason for it. It never ends. Unfortunately, some of us have these things called "brains", and can do this thing called "looking things up" that blow huge things called "holes" in your plans. You see, while it is true that the metabolism of meat and dairy foods require phosphorus, you neglect to take note that meat and dairy foods are RICH in that phosphorus themselves. Two ounces of swiss cheese provide more than the USDA requirement of phosphorus for an adult, even more than that required for a growing child or pregnant woman.
The vegetables you so loudly proclaim that would save us from phosphate doom are incredibly LOW in phosphorous, unless you supplement your beans and sprouts and roots with large quantities of fat-laden nuts.
If you are so concerned about sparing phosphate in the human metabolism, the thing you should be railing against is sugar, or more precisely, fructose. In fructose metabolism in the liver, it gobbles up phosphate at an alarming rate, producing little more than fat and waste products, including uric acid and enzymes that inhibit proper insulin metabolism. Fructose metabolism leaves you depleted of energy, gout-ridden, hypertensive, fat, and diabetic. AND it uses up phosphate.
But then, fructose comes from fruit, and fruit is a plant, and you vegetarians can't ever blame a plant for anything BAD, can you? A plant could never produce anything toxic to us, could it?
Why don't you just roll around in this lovely poison ivy for a while and think about it? Here, have a cigarette.
You should read another book "The Story of P" just published in Sweden (in English and Swedish) which tells the story of 40 years research on Phosphorus deficiency and the deseases multiple sclerosis, rheumatism, diabetes and scoliosis by the veterinarian and Phosphate researcher Harald Bergengren. Seehttp://www.gotlandsboken.se orhttp://www.phosphate.se
Gregor