<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Snagging Free-Range Solar Power in Space Is an Option</title> <atom:link href="http://www.miller-mccune.com/science-environment/snagging-free-range-solar-power-in-space-is-an-option-3382/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/science-environment/snagging-free-range-solar-power-in-space-is-an-option-3382/</link> <description>Nationally Acclaimed Politics, Science and Culture Coverage</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Anonymous User</title><link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/science-environment/snagging-free-range-solar-power-in-space-is-an-option-3382/#comment-834</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:16:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.miller-mccune.com.s72010.gridserver.com/2009/10/25/snagging-free-range-solar-power-in-space-is-an-option/#comment-834</guid> <description>&quot;5 terawatts (or 5,000 gigawatts) of electricity a year&quot;The &#039;a year&#039; part is completely redundant. A watt is a measurement of energy produced in a given time period (per second) and so adding yet another time component is both redundant and factually incorrect.Also, according to Wikipedia, the world energy consumption is actually more like 15 terawatts: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_resources_and_consumption</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;5 terawatts (or 5,000 gigawatts) of electricity a year&#8221;The &#8216;a year&#8217; part is completely redundant. A watt is a measurement of energy produced in a given time period (per second) and so adding yet another time component is both redundant and factually incorrect.Also, according to Wikipedia, the world energy consumption is actually more like 15 terawatts: <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_resources_and_consumption" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_resources_and_consumption</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keith Henson</title><link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/science-environment/snagging-free-range-solar-power-in-space-is-an-option-3382/#comment-781</link> <dc:creator>Keith Henson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:03:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.miller-mccune.com.s72010.gridserver.com/2009/10/25/snagging-free-range-solar-power-in-space-is-an-option/#comment-781</guid> <description>There is a set of tricks that might get the cost of starting a power satellite industry down to well under what the space station costs.  Google oil drum henson for more.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a set of tricks that might get the cost of starting a power satellite industry down to well under what the space station costs.  Google oil drum henson for more.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.miller-mccune.com @ 2012-02-13 04:21:40 by W3 Total Cache -->
