Advertise with Miller-McCune
Mmw_cover_0709_banner
Friday, March 19, 2010

Miller-McCune

Science & Environment

Concrete Solutions for Climate Change

New concrete manufacturing processes are not only green, they take carbon out of circulation.

  • Share:

  • digg
  • delicious
  • newsvine
  • google
  • reddit
  • facebook
  • yahoo
  • mixx
  • fark
  • stumbleupon

Is it possible green shoots are starting to appear in the concrete jungle? That’s the prospect being dangled by California’s Calera Corporation, which claims a concrete-making process that is not only carbon neutral but potentially carbon negative.

“What we’re doing is cheaper and less energy intensive than any other option out there,” says CEO Brent Constantz, a consulting professor at Stanford University’s Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences.

Among efforts to stem the tide of global warming, scientists are researching ways to capture and sequester carbon dioxide with geological storage deep underground or under the sea a favored option.

But Constantz reckons his company, recently awarded a $30 million Department of Energy grant, can achieve similar results by embedding CO2 in concrete, locking it up permanently in roadways, bridges and other structures. (Here’s his testimony before Congress in May.)

Concrete is a mixture of cement, aggregate — usually gravel and sand — and water. Making cement involves a chemical change that releases CO2 when the main ingredient, limestone, is baked at high temperatures to produce clinker, which is pulverized into cement powder.

Calera does not follow this so-called “heat-and-beat” process; instead, the Los Gatos-based company proposes using CO2 emissions from sources such as gas or coal-fired power plants to make cement.

The company is testing this at a pilot plant near the Moss Landing gas-fired power station on Monterey Bay, Calif. When raw flue gases belching out of those chimney stacks are bubbled through sea water, the CO2 is absorbed and produces carbonates, much like the natural mineral deposits that create coral reefs.

These chalky deposits can be used to make cement or as part of the aggregate, which accounts for 80 percent of concrete. Either way, says Constantz, Calera captures as much as half a ton of CO2 for each ton of cement.

Constantz says all performance testing to date, from Moss Landing and from trials in Australia, suggests a product at least equal to traditional cement and concrete in terms of strength, durability and flexibility.

Hendrik van Oss, cement commodity specialist with the U.S. Geological Survey, says producing one ton of cement releases close to a ton of CO2, about half from chemical reactions and half from the energy needed to heat the kilns.

That’s a huge and growing factor in global warming. Van Oss says current world cement production is about 2.8 billion tons, and he doesn’t argue with predictions that, driven by China’s rampant growth, production could reach 5 billion tons by 2030.

Like Calera, other young companies, in Canada and England, are also looking to meet this challenge by capturing CO2 in concrete.

Carbon Sense Solutions, based in Halifax, Nova Scotia, working with pre-cast concrete, is developing a system that reabsorbs CO2 generated during manufacture back into the concrete during curing, the strengthening and hardening process.

Meanwhile, Novacem, a company spun out of London’s Imperial College, also claims to be carbon-negative thanks to a carbonate-free cement that enables concrete to suck CO2 from the atmosphere.

Van Oss thinks this technique would work best on expansive flat surfaces, such as sidewalks and thin walls, since the process forms a crust of calcium carbonate just beneath the concrete surface, which gradually slows and obstructs further absorption.

Sign up for our free e-newsletter.

Are you on Facebook? Become our fan.

Follow us on Twitter.

Add our news to your site.

Post A Comment

We want your feedback! You can remain anonymous, but we'd prefer that you log in or sign up first. Trenchant and witty are cool but all comments are subject to approval/removal. Want more space than a little box? Write for us!

Create an account

*optional

Comments

This is a fraud. Do the simple calculation that any first year college chemistry student could. How much energy is produced when you make one ton of CO2 from coal or natural gas? Hoe much energy does it take to pressurize a gas stream containing this amount of CO2 to 2 bar to so that it can be bubbled through seawater? How much CO2 can be dissolved in sea water with out pH adjustment? With pH adjustment? How much sodium hydroxide does it take to adjust the pH to dissolve all the CO2 from question 1? How much material would be made and how much energy does it take to dry it?If you answer all these questions, you will find that each step takes more energy than produced when you make the CO2. Perhaps Calera has a 'silver bullet' (they didn't last year when I observed their technology), but there are too many laws of thermodynamics that need to be violated to make this thing work. If it seems too good to be true, it is and now we will be wasting $30M of my tax dollars to prove it when the money could be put to much better renewable research. And why? Because Khosla and his $$$ buys the political clout. Watch for the IPO, then watch for the fall.

http://www.miller-mccune.com/news/if-you-want-to-enjoy-the-scenery-hang-up-1595

Protected by Akismet
Blog with WordPress


Frank Nelson

Written By:Frank Nelson

Frank Nelson has written for newspapers and magazines in England (his original home), New Zealand (his adopted home), Australia (a temporary home) and the United States (his current home). The author of two lighthearted travel books, All You Need is Luck and A Little More Luck, he is now a freelance writer based in Santa Barbara, Calif.