Ad for Idea Lobby blogger Emily Badger
Friday, February 10, 2012   |  Miller-McCune Homepage

close this window


We encourage you to share any articles or material you find on Miller-McCune.com with friends and colleagues. Please fill in the fields below with the name and e-mail address. Then fill in the same information for you. Miller-McCune will not keep any information about you or your friend, and the e-mail your friends receive will appear to have come from your e-mail address. The asterisk (*) denotes a required field.


From:





To:







The Idea Lobby

March 17, 2010

Curses, FOIA’d Again

The Obama administration’s stated push for more government openness hasn’t fully manifested itself in the Freedom of Information arena.


| PRINT | SHARE

In one of his first acts the day he settled into office last January, Barack Obama issued a memorandum on the Freedom of Information Act, the 1966 federal law requiring the disclosure of most public documents that has been variously applied by every administration since.

Bush-era Attorney General John Ashcroft famously interpreted the law to suggest agencies should err on the side of denying records requests that might interfere with national security, privacy or any of FOIA’s nine exemptions. The Department of Justice, he said, would defend agencies’ decisions to withhold material “unless they lack a sound legal basis.”

Obama sought to reverse that logic with a different presumption: “In the face of doubt,” his memorandum declared, “openness prevails.” To the media organizations responsible for filing many FOIA requests and the open-government advocacy groups that champion that right, this sounded pretty good.

“For a long time now, there’s been too much secrecy in this city,” Obama said at the time.

But it turns out a year later that his promising words — and the directive that followed soon after from new Attorney General Eric Holder — haven’t translated into much concrete change. The National Security Archive at George Washington University this week released its annual audit of federal FOIA compliance, and the report’s title alone is discouraging: “Sunshine and Shadows: The Clear Obama Message for Freedom of Information Meets Mixed Results.”

Idea Lobby

THE IDEA LOBBY
Miller-McCune's Washington correspondent Emily Badger follows the ideas informing, explaining and influencing government, from the local think tank circuit to academic research that shapes D.C. policy from afar.

The report surveyed 90 federal agencies (by, well, FOIA), and found that many have done nothing to implement Obama’s policy shift, and even fewer have improved their document release rates as a result. Thirteen agencies didn’t even reply — after five months — to the National Security Archive’s request for information on the topic. (Law requires a response, not necessarily the answer, to FOIAs within 20 business days.)

Only four agencies, including Holder’s Department of Justice, have improved their release rates in the last year. The audit was looking not only for an increase in the number of documents released (which could simply indicate an increase in the number of overall FOIAs processed), but also a corresponding decrease in denials.

Every agency at least appears to have gotten word of the new Obama and Holder memos, an improvement from the last major policy change in 2002. Then, “a few agencies responded by asking ‘What Ashcroft memo?’”

“But the evidence of concrete changes,” the audit concludes, “is almost as mixed as under the Ashcroft memo.”

Out of the 90 agencies, 13 provided documentation that they had made concrete changes to their FOIA guidelines, including publishing expanded information online to eliminate the need for some FOIA requests in the first place. Fourteen agencies merely expanded their FOIA training to inform employees about the new presumption of openness. The bulk of respondents, 35 agencies, had no records indicating they had done anything at all about the new policies.

This last group includes some of the most frequently FOIA’d departments in the government — the CIA, the Treasury Department and the SEC. Also in this group was, surprisingly, the National Science Foundation.

In one other troubling sign, the audit found that some information requests as dusty as 18 years old are still languishing in the system.

Sunshine advocates could draw two conclusions from the report: The Obama administration hasn’t made overhauling the FOIA system quite the priority it suggested a year ago, or making that priority come true will take much longer than a year.

Suggest the report’s authors: “One year is too early to render a final judgment on how far President Obama can move the government toward openness, but this Audit finds that much more pressure and leadership will be necessary.”

Sign up for our free e-newsletter.

Are you on Facebook? Become our fan.

Follow us on Twitter.

Add our news to your site.

 

word on the street

Post your comment here

more in this section

Ad for Moving Picture column

also by this author

Emily Badger

Emily Badger is a freelance writer living in the Washington, D.C. area who has contributed to The New York Times, International Herald Tribune an...

SOPA Debate Highlights Congress’s Ignorance

The divide between new technology and what the government understands about it threatens the U.S., says Clay Johnson of Expert Labs.

Time for a More Sensible, Permanent Calendar?

An astronomer and an economist suggest the world would be a more sensible place if it dropped floating days of the week and leap years by switching to their Hanke-Henry Permanent Calendar.

Rating LA’s Safety Levels by ZIP Code

A new scorecard for violence prevention in Los Angeles puts hard numbers on hard problems, and does it for every ZIP code in the sprawling city.

Feds Poke Hole in Needle Exchange Funding

Despite evidence that needle exchange programs for drug users slow the spread of AIDS, the new U.S. government spending bill once again defunds such programs.

Why a Democracy Needs Uninformed People

In a lesson taught by schools of fish, researchers determine that uninformed individuals are actually a benefit to democracy by sanding off extreme views.

Receive 1 year (6 issues) of our print magazine for just $14.95. Miller-McCune features polished, in-depth reports on research and solutions across the policy spectrum — from health care, education and energy to international affairs, poverty and the global economy. It's a must read for well-informed and solutions-driven individuals.

Loading

follow us on:

join our newsletter:

from the source

‘Orcas as Slaves’ Argument Sinks

An effort to identify five performing orcas as slaves failed in part, argues one scholar, because there’s no legal precedent establishing them as persons.

The Perceived Delicacy of the Female Conductor

New research finds listeners judge symphonic music differently when they’re told the conductor is a woman.

Pressure to Conform Can Inspire Creativity

New research suggests less-creative people do more innovative thinking when they are told individualism is the norm, and instructed to conform.

Neglected Tropical Diseases Neglected No More?

World health leaders announce coordinated push to eradicate or control neglected tropical diseases.

Children’s Books Increasingly Ignore Natural World

A survey of award-winning children’s picture books from 1938 to 2008 suggests our increasing estrangement from the natural environment.