<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Ballot Initiatives: Making The Grade?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.miller-mccune.com/politics/ballot-initiatives-making-the-grade-10161/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/politics/ballot-initiatives-making-the-grade-10161/</link> <description>Nationally Acclaimed Politics, Science and Culture Coverage</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: arlindsay</title><link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/politics/ballot-initiatives-making-the-grade-10161/#comment-2745</link> <dc:creator>arlindsay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 01:03:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.miller-mccune.com/?p=10161#comment-2745</guid> <description>I applaud the writers for extracting from BISC the admission that they oppose &quot;an electoral system dominated solely by citizens.&quot;  Strip away the rhetoric about transparency, fraud, process, etc. and you find an organization seeking to control which measures appear on the ballot.  Stalin said, &quot;The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything&quot;  BISC goes further.  Why risk having the wrong people count the votes when you can control which issues appear on the ballot?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I applaud the writers for extracting from BISC the admission that they oppose &#8220;an electoral system dominated solely by citizens.&#8221;  Strip away the rhetoric about transparency, fraud, process, etc. and you find an organization seeking to control which measures appear on the ballot.  Stalin said, &#8220;The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything&#8221;  BISC goes further.  Why risk having the wrong people count the votes when you can control which issues appear on the ballot?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Leslie Graves</title><link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/politics/ballot-initiatives-making-the-grade-10161/#comment-2615</link> <dc:creator>Leslie Graves</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:59:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.miller-mccune.com/?p=10161#comment-2615</guid> <description>Although our article on Ballotpedia doesn&#039;t say this in a prominent place, &lt;a href=&quot;http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/California_Proposition_1A_%282008%29&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;California&#039;s Proposition 1A in 2008&lt;/a&gt; was &lt;a href=&quot;http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Statewide_bond_propositions_%28California%29&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bond proposition&lt;/a&gt; referred to the ballot by the California state legislature...not a citizen-initiated measure.Similarly, for example, &lt;a href=&quot;http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/California_2010_ballot_propositions#Qualified_for_June_8_ballot&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;3 of the 5 measures on the June 8 ballot&lt;/a&gt; this year in California are referred (not initiated) measures.Overall for 2010 statewide ballots, of the approximately &lt;a href=&quot;http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Ballotpedia%27s_Tuesday_Count_for_2010&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;70 measures that have so far been certified&lt;/a&gt; for ballots, &lt;a href=&quot;http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Ballot_Measure_Scorecard,_2010#tab=Amendments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;most are referrals.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;(Ed -- Thanks for pointing that out. We have amended the story.)&lt;/em&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although our article on Ballotpedia doesn&#8217;t say this in a prominent place, <a
href="http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/California_Proposition_1A_%282008%29" rel="nofollow">California&#8217;s Proposition 1A in 2008</a> was <a
href="http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Statewide_bond_propositions_%28California%29" rel="nofollow">bond proposition</a> referred to the ballot by the California state legislature&#8230;not a citizen-initiated measure.</p><p>Similarly, for example, <a
href="http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/California_2010_ballot_propositions#Qualified_for_June_8_ballot" rel="nofollow">3 of the 5 measures on the June 8 ballot</a> this year in California are referred (not initiated) measures.</p><p>Overall for 2010 statewide ballots, of the approximately <a
href="http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Ballotpedia%27s_Tuesday_Count_for_2010" rel="nofollow">70 measures that have so far been certified</a> for ballots, <a
href="http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Ballot_Measure_Scorecard,_2010#tab=Amendments" rel="nofollow">most are referrals.</a></p><p><em>(Ed &#8212; Thanks for pointing that out. We have amended the story.)</em></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.miller-mccune.com @ 2012-02-12 22:24:51 by W3 Total Cache -->
