<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Why is Immigration Coverage Often So Negative?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.miller-mccune.com/media/immigration-coverage-negative-3632/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/media/immigration-coverage-negative-3632/</link> <description>Nationally Acclaimed Politics, Science and Culture Coverage</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Mary Hopkins</title><link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/media/immigration-coverage-negative-3632/#comment-454</link> <dc:creator>Mary Hopkins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:55:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.miller-mccune.com.s72010.gridserver.com/2009/06/17/why-is-immigration-coverage-often-so-negative/#comment-454</guid> <description>A perspective from New England: The trend has exceptions. I live in Greater Boston. Here we have some sanctuary cities, where the press is mostly relatively friendly (some exceptions in the letters) and some cities where anti-immigrant organizations have drawn the attention of SPLC, where the papers try to be balanced but are getting bombarded in letters and comments. I live in an in-between town: no sanctuary laws, 30% foreign-born population, papers completely dominated by an older generation of immigrants, predominantly Italian &amp; Irish surnames. In my town, we tried to document police harassment of immigrants through police blotters (arrests for &quot;driving w/o license&quot; -- our guys have x-ray vision!) but ACLU&#039;s lawyers told us that they editorial line of the papers was so blatantly racist that we couldn&#039;t prove it was the cops that were doing the discriminating.Study&#039;s good, I don&#039;t mean to contradict. It&#039;s just that we&#039;ve got a crazy quilt, at least in my area.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A perspective from New England: The trend has exceptions. I live in Greater Boston. Here we have some sanctuary cities, where the press is mostly relatively friendly (some exceptions in the letters) and some cities where anti-immigrant organizations have drawn the attention of SPLC, where the papers try to be balanced but are getting bombarded in letters and comments. I live in an in-between town: no sanctuary laws, 30% foreign-born population, papers completely dominated by an older generation of immigrants, predominantly Italian &#038; Irish surnames. In my town, we tried to document police harassment of immigrants through police blotters (arrests for &#8220;driving w/o license&#8221; &#8212; our guys have x-ray vision!) but ACLU&#8217;s lawyers told us that they editorial line of the papers was so blatantly racist that we couldn&#8217;t prove it was the cops that were doing the discriminating.Study&#8217;s good, I don&#8217;t mean to contradict. It&#8217;s just that we&#8217;ve got a crazy quilt, at least in my area.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian Lewis</title><link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/media/immigration-coverage-negative-3632/#comment-431</link> <dc:creator>Brian Lewis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:42:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.miller-mccune.com.s72010.gridserver.com/2009/06/17/why-is-immigration-coverage-often-so-negative/#comment-431</guid> <description>The geographic trend the study identifies is fascinating.  Perhaps one could infer that, at least when it comes to immigration, the press serves a cultivating function - shaping society into something approximating the actual, physical fence that some would have line the borders.  No doubt the media-cultivated one is more effective.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The geographic trend the study identifies is fascinating.  Perhaps one could infer that, at least when it comes to immigration, the press serves a cultivating function &#8211; shaping society into something approximating the actual, physical fence that some would have line the borders.  No doubt the media-cultivated one is more effective.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.miller-mccune.com @ 2012-02-12 18:28:22 by W3 Total Cache -->
