close this window
Doctored Information
While the purpose of informed consent laws is to educate women considering an abortion, they apparently do little to dissuade them from proceeding.
A new study concludes that carefully crafted informed consent laws, rather than discouraging women to forgo an abortion, have zero impact on the amount of abortions performed in the states that choose to mandate these “scary briefings.”
California State University, Long Beach, Economist Marshall H. Medoff, who has written a variety of studies on women’s issues, finds that the four areas of informed consent laws (possibilities of negative mental health associations, increased possibility of breast cancer, increased chance of infertility and images of fetal pain) intended to dissuade women from obtaining abortions, have no statistical impact on the number of procedures performed.
Medoff’s finding matters because some pro-life state legislatures have spent countless hours crafting informed consent mandates intended to caution women against obtaining abortions.
In Texas, for example, abortion-specific materials cite increased possibility of breast cancer. West Virginia materials warn that abortion is linked to side effects including eating disorders, sexual dysfunction and drug abuse. Simply put, these extensive claims can be dramatic in many cases-and sometimes they are just false.
Medoff’s study demonstrates that, like anti-smoking and anti-drug campaigns, using scare tactics to frighten individuals into making “good” health decisions can be extremely ineffective.
But the study raises another question: Are right-to-know laws really just scare tactics?
Yes, there is some egregious information floating around that doctors are now required to share with women considering an abortion (for example, there is virtually no link between obtaining an abortion and an increased risk of breast cancer), but most information seems relevant, if only slightly controversial — just like the procedure itself.
The real problem with right-to-know laws isn’t that patients are being informed of the negative repercussions of abortions, but that in some states they are presented only with these negative consequences (as opposed to detailing a full range of emotional and physical responses).
Without a federal consensus on at least the science of abortion, pro-life or pro-choice leaning state legislatures can hijack the patient-doctor relationship by mandating doctors to disclose heavily biased information. And the doctor-patient relationship is taking hits in other ways, too. It was reported today that beginning Nov. 1, a new law in Oklahoma will require physicians to disclose information on their patients’ abortions to the state’s Department of Health, which will then be posted online. The collected information includes the date of the abortion, the county in which abortion was performed, and the age, race and marital status of mother, among other things.
Sign up for our free e-newsletter.
Are you on Facebook? Become our fan.
Follow us on Twitter.
word on the street
more in this section
The Perceived Delicacy of the Female Conductor
Pressure to Conform Can Inspire Creativity
Children’s Books Increasingly Ignore Natural World
Morning People May Be More Creative in the Afternoon
Sex on the Brain Proves Costly for Men
Bitter About Your Life? Blame Facebook
‘Fair Trade’ Chocolate Perceived as Healthier
How the Unconscious Mind Boosts Creative Output
For Better Grades, Try Bach in the Background
College Football Wins Lower Guys’ GPA
also by this author
Erik HaydenFormer Miller-McCune Fellow Erik Hayden recently graduated from Pepperdine University with a B.A. in Political Science and a minor in Religion. He reg...
Prisoners of the StatesA new book, “The Enemy In Our Hands,” looks at how America has treated — and mistreated — prisoners of war through history resonates in the age of terror.
Chinese Audiences Give Two Thumbs UpLooking for lesson in cross-cultural psychology? Look no further than the different ways Americans and Chinese react to good, bad movies.
Today’s College Students Lacking in EmpathyA new meta-analysis finds that today’s college students have far less empathy than their forebearers.
Larger Schools May Breed Less Parental InvolvementA new analysis finds that parents are less likely to volunteer when their children attend larger schools.
The Anatomy of a BoycottA look at who boycotts whom in the United States finds that those on the margins are the most likely to participate.
Receive 1 year (6 issues) of our print magazine for just $14.95. Miller-McCune features polished, in-depth reports on research and solutions across the policy spectrum — from health care, education and energy to international affairs, poverty and the global economy. It's a must read for well-informed and solutions-driven individuals.
follow us on:
join our newsletter:
from the source
The wage gap between the sexes in America has been closing much faster than anyone realized, but that’s tempered by learning it’s been much wider than measurements had shown.
An effort to identify five performing orcas as slaves failed in part, argues one scholar, because there’s no legal precedent establishing them as persons.
Transportation used to be one of the few guaranteed areas of agreement when ideology trumped pragmatism in D.C. But that’s no longer the case.
A lot of people say they watch the Super Bowl mostly for the ads. But it turns out a good game surrounding those ads makes them seem better.
After decades of obstacles hindering the voting process, new laws will allow overseas and military voters to submit their votes in time for the 2012 election.
