close this window
Watching You In the Loo
In honor of Global Handwashing Day, we examine the hygiene of public restroom users and what motivates them to wash up.
With influenza season in full course, it’s good to have scientific researchers on top of a major factor relating to flu spread — handwashing.
A study by British researchers asks who is doing it and why?
This matters greatly in designing a program to change behavior — think swine flu’s spread — and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine understands that. It released the results of a study published in the American Journal of Public Health to coincide with today’s second annual Global Handwashing Day.
Researchers did reconnaissance on 250,000 people who used restrooms at a service station in England from July through September.
The subjects were greeted by messages on LED screens at the entrance to the restrooms that encouraged handwashing, using suggestions from various “behavior domains” such as knowledge of risk (Water doesn’t kill germs, soap does), status/identity (Don’t be a dope, wash with soap), disgust (Soap it off or eat it later) and norms/affiliation (Is the person next to you washing with soap?).
The effects of the messages on behavior were measured in incidences of handwashing captured through soap-dispensing sensors, with the results stored on a computer.
We would give this study an A for ingenuity as well as thoroughness. So, what washed up?
Handwashing rates between men surveyed (108,000 restroom uses) and women (90,000 restroom uses) varied widely, with women twice as likely to wash their hands (64 percent) as men (32 percent). Are we surprised? (Only that men used the bathroom more …)
Motivation varied between the genders, with women more motivated by knowledge activat ion, positive control and knowledge of risk and men more motivated by disgust.
Even researchers were a little taken aback.
They noted that women “have a higher disgust sensitivity than men” but speculated that women do respond to disgust, however, they respond more strongly to knowledge-based messages or the mention of germs than to disgust-based messages. Hmmmm.
Getting the Message
The mechanics of motivation have been a fertile field for Miller-McCune. For example, while disgust may work with handwashing, keep the disgust to the verbal, not the visual. Graphic anti-methamphetamine and ominous or graphic anti-smoking ads don’t do the trick as well as less abrasive messages, for example. And information-only messages meant to reduce the number of abortions also fare poorly, it seems. Of course, should the message be couched in a sitcom or hourlong drama, these messages may get a bit more play. And lest you feel too much like a lab rat, who you are determines how you react, as does where you come from. |
There was some common ground — a message both genders seemed to respond to and at higher incidence than other messages: “Is the person next to you washing with soap?” Researchers found handwashing increased when more than one person was in the restroom, with a slightly higher increase among the men.
Overall finding: Call it what you may — peer pressure, shame, wanting to be part of the norm — people wash their hands more when under some sort of surveillance — from their fellow humans.
So, although the United States is not among the 73 countries around the world participating in Global Handwashing Day, Americans might tip their hats to the British, who have identified social factors likely to be effective in increasing that all-important handwashing.
And remember, President Obama has asked us to do it. He won’t be watching, but someone else may be.
Sign up for our free e-newsletter.
Are you on Facebook? Become our fan.
Follow us on Twitter.
word on the street
more in this section
House Bill Puts Transportation in Partisan Crossfire
A Perennial Epicenter, Now for Same-Sex Marriage
Prop 8 May Be Same-Sex Couples’ Least Worry
EarthScope: A Seismic Shift in Data Gathering
Pressure to Conform Can Inspire Creativity
Learning to Read When a School System Falters
Better Super Bowl Makes for Better Ads
Five Orcas, Five Slaves or Five Persons?
Overseas Troops Finally Get Fair Shot at Voting
Quake Rescues Reserve, Shakes Baja Fishing Town
also by this author
More Evidence Linking Pesticides and MalformationsAdditional studies suggest that common pesticides may be endocrine disruptors, bad news that nonetheless warms the heart of one citizen scientist.
Think Biomass, Not Natural GasJohn Lennon said imagining world peace is easy if you try. Imagining the energy makeup of a country four decades from now may be a little more difficult.
Empower Your Appliances with the Smart GridThe manager of the energy portfolio for the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory discusses the benefits of evening out our day’s use of electricity and how future appliances will decide when they can spark up most cheaply.
A Friends and Family Plan for the FluThe Friendship Paradox may provide a handy predictor for whether a flu bug will result in a mass outbreak or a few cases of the sniffles.
Viewing Poisons at Our National ParksA groundbreaking study of pristine national parks in the Western United States found an amazing array of airborne pollutants, including some chemicals banned for decades.

Receive 1 year (6 issues) of our print magazine for just $14.95. Miller-McCune features polished, in-depth reports on research and solutions across the policy spectrum — from health care, education and energy to international affairs, poverty and the global economy. It's a must read for well-informed and solutions-driven individuals.

follow us on:
from the source

World health leaders announce coordinated push to eradicate or control neglected tropical diseases.

A survey of award-winning children’s picture books from 1938 to 2008 suggests our increasing estrangement from the natural environment.

Rather than moaning about too many cars on the road, the Ridesharing Institute says the real key to battling traffic congestion and pollution is filling empty passenger seats.

Various ways of assigning numbers to events, people, and actions is an ancient parlor game, but let’s not take it beyond that.

Researchers looking at how we fixate on threats uncover more evidence of a biological component to the red-blue divide.







