close this window
Smile to Live Longer?
Don’t laugh: New research on baseball players suggests that the wider your smile, the longer you may live.
This bit of research should make you smile (or maybe smirk).
Ernest L. Abel and Michael L. Kruger at Wayne State University have found that the larger your smile, the longer you may live. Yes, that’s right; “smile intensity” seems to have a statistically significant effect on a person’s longevity.
In their research, to be published in the journal Psychological Science, the professors conducted an amusing case study that used a sampling of 230 photographs of baseball players culled from the now-defunct Sporting News Baseball Register. The professional ball players were chosen as a representative sample because detailed life statistics (such as birth, death, education, marital status, etc.) were available for each, leading to a more conclusive study.
The players’ headshots, taken in the lead-up to the 1952 season, were analyzed by the researchers and their assistants and given flat distinctions of either “no smile,” “partial smile” or “full (Duchenne) smile.” After some Web sleuthing, the researchers compiled the life data for the baseball players and controlled for body mass index, career length, marital status, college attendance and other longevity factors.
The results? Even a partial smile added years to a player’s lifespan.
On average, the players with no smile lived for 72.9 years, a full two years less than those who exhibited partial smiles. Those with the largest grins reaped an even longer lifespan: Players with full smiles lived to 79.9 years, almost two years longer than the typical life expectancy for an American. That’s an overall difference of seven years of life between those players that chose not to smile and those who gave wholehearted grins.
The researchers also ran the same study again and rated each of the players headshots based on a three-point scale of attractiveness. Unlike a player’s smile, there was no significant correlation between a player’s perceived attractiveness and their longevity.
But smiles, it seems, can be telling about our characteristics.
“Individuals whose underlying emotional disposition is reflected in voluntary or involuntary Duchenne smiles may be basically happier than those with less intense smiles and hence maybe more predisposed to benefit from the effects of positive emotionality,” concluded the researchers.
Before you smirk and explain that there must be some other factor involved, it’s worth mentioning that this study is not an anomaly. The researchers cited numerous other studies displaying the powerful effects of relatively simple facial expressions and emotional conditions like involuntary happiness or sadness.
Last year, widely published research by Matthew J. Hertenstein found that smile intensity in yearbook photographs could predict relatively accurately whether or not a person would later go through a divorce. In 2005, a study found that participants could predict the outcome of 70 percent of Senate congressional elections with just a split-second judgment of the facial appearance of the candidates. Related studies with controlled circumstances have found that facial appearance (and smiles or lack thereof) can also predict sexual orientation and socioeconomic status.
Much of the evidence, it appears, has been written all over our faces.
Sign up for our free e-newsletter.
Are you on Facebook? Become our fan.
Follow us on Twitter.
word on the street
more in this section
Learning to Read When a School System Falters
Better Super Bowl Makes for Better Ads
Five Orcas, Five Slaves or Five Persons?
Overseas Troops Finally Get Fair Shot at Voting
Quake Rescues Reserve, Shakes Baja Fishing Town
Neglected Tropical Diseases Neglected No More?
Pirate Party Docks at Berlin’s Parliament
Children’s Books Increasingly Ignore Natural World
Conservation’s Earnest Message Could Use Levity
Traffic Solution: Make Drivers Less Lonely
also by this author
Erik HaydenFormer Miller-McCune Fellow Erik Hayden recently graduated from Pepperdine University with a B.A. in Political Science and a minor in Religion. He reg...
Prisoners of the StatesA new book, “The Enemy In Our Hands,” looks at how America has treated — and mistreated — prisoners of war through history resonates in the age of terror.
Chinese Audiences Give Two Thumbs UpLooking for lesson in cross-cultural psychology? Look no further than the different ways Americans and Chinese react to good, bad movies.
Today’s College Students Lacking in EmpathyA new meta-analysis finds that today’s college students have far less empathy than their forebearers.
Larger Schools May Breed Less Parental InvolvementA new analysis finds that parents are less likely to volunteer when their children attend larger schools.
The Anatomy of a BoycottA look at who boycotts whom in the United States finds that those on the margins are the most likely to participate.
Receive 1 year (6 issues) of our print magazine for just $14.95. Miller-McCune features polished, in-depth reports on research and solutions across the policy spectrum — from health care, education and energy to international affairs, poverty and the global economy. It's a must read for well-informed and solutions-driven individuals.
follow us on:
join our newsletter:
from the source
Various ways of assigning numbers to events, people, and actions is an ancient parlor game, but let’s not take it beyond that.
Researchers looking at how we fixate on threats uncover more evidence of a biological component to the red-blue divide.
New research finds problems that require a flash of illumination to solve are best approached during the time of day when you’re not at your peak.
Texas Republicans won Friday as the Supreme Court rejected a judicially drawn redistricting map, but not for the reasons you might think.
A report from The Sentencing Project argues that a primary driver for privatizing corrections isn’t really paying off.
