<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Looking Back in Anger</title> <atom:link href="http://www.miller-mccune.com/health/looking-back-in-anger-4953/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/health/looking-back-in-anger-4953/</link> <description>Nationally Acclaimed Politics, Science and Culture Coverage</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:00:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/health/looking-back-in-anger-4953/#comment-2789</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:48:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.miller-mccune.com.s72010.gridserver.com/?p=4953#comment-2789</guid> <description>Why would one sacrifice his career and his fundings?
Why would one oppose against his own field?Duesberg, as well as Serge Lang and many others along them surely were smart enough to understand:
This will be a hard time.Nevertheless, these big thinkers decided to speak out against something what they considered a big mistake.I don&#039;t know whether HIV has sth. to do with AIDS or not. But today it is proven that the basic papers from May 4th 1984, were faked by Gallo in many aspects.So might be a coincidence...I wonder why Duesberg is always attacked but never discussed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would one sacrifice his career and his fundings?<br
/> Why would one oppose against his own field?</p><p>Duesberg, as well as Serge Lang and many others along them surely were smart enough to understand:<br
/> This will be a hard time.</p><p>Nevertheless, these big thinkers decided to speak out against something what they considered a big mistake.</p><p>I don&#8217;t know whether HIV has sth. to do with AIDS or not. But today it is proven that the basic papers from May 4th 1984, were faked by Gallo in many aspects.</p><p>So might be a coincidence&#8230;</p><p>I wonder why Duesberg is always attacked but never discussed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous User</title><link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/health/looking-back-in-anger-4953/#comment-1511</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:47:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.miller-mccune.com.s72010.gridserver.com/?p=4953#comment-1511</guid> <description>The use of anonymnity or pseudonymnity is not exactly unusual when researching or publishing works, as Henry Bauer well knows. Bauer himself published his own memoir &quot;To Rise above Principle: The Memoirs of an Unreconstructed Dean&quot; under the pseudonym &quot;Josef Martin&quot;. http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-130930216.htmlMind you, if I had published the kind of &quot;unreconstructed&quot; homophobic hogwash that Bauer did in his book, I&#039;d have made sure I chose a pseudonym too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of anonymnity or pseudonymnity is not exactly unusual when researching or publishing works, as Henry Bauer well knows. Bauer himself published his own memoir &#8220;To Rise above Principle: The Memoirs of an Unreconstructed Dean&#8221; under the pseudonym &#8220;Josef Martin&#8221;. <a
href="http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-130930216.htmlMind" rel="nofollow">http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-130930216.htmlMind</a> you, if I had published the kind of &#8220;unreconstructed&#8221; homophobic hogwash that Bauer did in his book, I&#8217;d have made sure I chose a pseudonym too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Henry Bauer</title><link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/health/looking-back-in-anger-4953/#comment-928</link> <dc:creator>Henry Bauer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:49:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.miller-mccune.com.s72010.gridserver.com/?p=4953#comment-928</guid> <description>&quot;Denying AIDS pointedly contains several photographs of the author posing with those on the other side of the debate, including Duesberg&quot;What&#039;s REALLY interesting is that the identification on Kalichman&#039;s name tag has been removed, to hide from readers the fact that he was posing as &quot;Joe Newton&quot;, a graduate student, and that the conference was about cancer and aneuploidy, not HIV/AIDS, and Kalichman didn&#039;t talk with Duesberg about HIV/AIDS, in fact Duesberg barely recalls meeting him after seeing the photo. On Kalichman&#039;s Picasa site, there are other photos from that cancer conference showing Kalichman&#039;s name tag saying &quot;Joe Newton&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Denying AIDS pointedly contains several photographs of the author posing with those on the other side of the debate, including Duesberg&#8221;What&#8217;s REALLY interesting is that the identification on Kalichman&#8217;s name tag has been removed, to hide from readers the fact that he was posing as &#8220;Joe Newton&#8221;, a graduate student, and that the conference was about cancer and aneuploidy, not HIV/AIDS, and Kalichman didn&#8217;t talk with Duesberg about HIV/AIDS, in fact Duesberg barely recalls meeting him after seeing the photo. On Kalichman&#8217;s Picasa site, there are other photos from that cancer conference showing Kalichman&#8217;s name tag saying &#8220;Joe Newton&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous User</title><link>http://www.miller-mccune.com/health/looking-back-in-anger-4953/#comment-850</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:03:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.miller-mccune.com.s72010.gridserver.com/?p=4953#comment-850</guid> <description>The article states about Duesberg,&quot;The questions he raised about whether retroviruses can cause AIDS were crystallized as definitive statements in subsequent articles in prestigious scientific journals, defining Duesberg as the most visible dissident AIDS scientist in the world, despite his never actually having done any work on HIV or AIDS.&quot;This ignores the fact that Duesberg was at the time one of the preeminent experts on retroviruses.  That was the vantage point from which he criticized the HIV theory, so he knew very well what he was talking about.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article states about Duesberg,&#8221;The questions he raised about whether retroviruses can cause AIDS were crystallized as definitive statements in subsequent articles in prestigious scientific journals, defining Duesberg as the most visible dissident AIDS scientist in the world, despite his never actually having done any work on HIV or AIDS.&#8221;This ignores the fact that Duesberg was at the time one of the preeminent experts on retroviruses.  That was the vantage point from which he criticized the HIV theory, so he knew very well what he was talking about.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.miller-mccune.com @ 2012-02-12 20:05:52 by W3 Total Cache -->
