Ad for Idea Lobby blogger Emily Badger
Monday, February 13, 2012   |  Miller-McCune Homepage

close this window


We encourage you to share any articles or material you find on Miller-McCune.com with friends and colleagues. Please fill in the fields below with the name and e-mail address. Then fill in the same information for you. Miller-McCune will not keep any information about you or your friend, and the e-mail your friends receive will appear to have come from your e-mail address. The asterisk (*) denotes a required field.


From:





To:







Findings

April 26, 2010

Study: Touch on the Shoulder, Bet on the Market

Can some forms of physical contact make you more likely to exhibit risk-taking behavior? So maybe the meltdown is mom’s fault.


| PRINT | SHARE

What’s to blame for our economic woes?

Is it Bush, Dodd, too much regulation, too little regulation, a wild-card-like religion … or maybe a comforting, maternal pat on the shoulder?

That might be the conclusion of two researchers at Columbia University and the University of Alberta, who find that physical contact increased feelings of security and, in turn, stimulated risk-taking. It’s a somewhat humorous finding that, on first glance, seems preposterous and on second glance seems slightly less so.

Here’s the logic from the first of their three-part experiment:

Sixty-seven undergraduate business students were rounded up to take part in the psychology experiment ostensibly about “consumer behavior.” Each student entered a room with a cubicle for a test that required making a series of hypothetical financial decisions, eventually deciding whether or not to take a risky gamble. As the students entered, some were greeted by a female experimenter who gave a friendly (and “approximately one-second”) pat on the back to each participant.

Researchers found that those who received the pat on the back were “significantly more likely to select the risky gambles than those in the no-touch condition.” Males and females were equally likely to exhibit this behavior.

In the second and third experiment (which used different sets of student samples) researchers tested variations, finding that being touched on the shoulder (deemed a “subtle comforting touch”) by a female experimenter is more likely to embolden would-be financial risk-takers than a handshake.

Researchers concluded that, “minimal physical contact can exert a strong influence on decision-making and risk preferences of adults, possibly also outside the financial domain.”

Even with the caveats, this study could be titled “College students who are roped into taking part in a psychology experiment are more likely to take risks with Monopoly money when they get patted on the back by a female experimenter.” But belittling the research misses the intent and the pedigree.

Professors Jonathan Levav and Jennifer J. Argo cite previous research finding that physical contact — particularly maternal contact — may lead to more exploratory behavior among participants. These studies have shown that this security created by touch can influence subjects as diverse as an infant’s desire to explore new settings to an adult’s willingness to tip a waitress.

 

word on the street

Post your comment here

more in this section

Ad for Moving Picture column

also by this author

Erik Hayden

Former Miller-McCune Fellow Erik Hayden recently graduated from Pepperdine University with a B.A. in Political Science and a minor in Religion. He reg...

Prisoners of the States

A new book, “The Enemy In Our Hands,” looks at how America has treated — and mistreated — prisoners of war through history resonates in the age of terror.

Chinese Audiences Give Two Thumbs Up

Looking for lesson in cross-cultural psychology? Look no further than the different ways Americans and Chinese react to good, bad movies.

Today’s College Students Lacking in Empathy

A new meta-analysis finds that today’s college students have far less empathy than their forebearers.

Larger Schools May Breed Less Parental Involvement

A new analysis finds that parents are less likely to volunteer when their children attend larger schools.

The Anatomy of a Boycott

A look at who boycotts whom in the United States finds that those on the margins are the most likely to participate.

Receive 1 year (6 issues) of our print magazine for just $14.95. Miller-McCune features polished, in-depth reports on research and solutions across the policy spectrum — from health care, education and energy to international affairs, poverty and the global economy. It's a must read for well-informed and solutions-driven individuals.

Loading

follow us on:

join our newsletter:

from the source

Gender Wage Gap Skewed By Survey Flaws

The wage gap between the sexes in America has been closing much faster than anyone realized, but that’s tempered by learning it’s been much wider than measurements had shown.

‘Orcas as Slaves’ Argument Sinks

An effort to identify five performing orcas as slaves failed in part, argues one scholar, because there’s no legal precedent establishing them as persons.

House Puts Transportation in Partisan Crossfire

Transportation used to be one of the few guaranteed areas of agreement when ideology trumped pragmatism in D.C. But that’s no longer the case.

Better Super Bowl Makes for Better Ads

A lot of people say they watch the Super Bowl mostly for the ads. But it turns out a good game surrounding those ads makes them seem better.

Overseas Troops Finally Get Fair Shot at Voting

After decades of obstacles hindering the voting process, new laws will allow overseas and military voters to submit their votes in time for the 2012 election.