close this window
Love, But Not Lust, Inspires Creativity
New research finds love inspires creativity, but thoughts of sex stimulate analytical thinking.
Over the centuries, romantic love has inspired countless composers, poets and painters. But what exactly is the link between artistry and amour? Newly published psychological research refines this eternal equation, suggesting that while love does inspire creativity, thoughts of sex enhance analytical thinking.
“Love and lust lead to different ways of perceiving the world,” the research team, led by psychologist Jens Forster of the University of Amsterdam, reports in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. While love inspires musings about long-term outcomes (having kids, growing old together, etc.), thoughts of sex tends to focus the mind on the here and now.
Love, in other words, is dreamy, and dreams are linked to creativity. Sex, on the other hand, is about achieving an immediate goal.
The researchers asked 60 university students to imagine either a long walk with their beloved partner, or casual sex with someone they were attracted to but not in love with. They were then asked to solve four logic problems from the Graduate Record Exam and three problems requiring creative thinking to come up with a solution.
Of the questions requiring creative insights to solve, those who had thought about love and romance did best, with those who had thought about sex coming in last (after members of the control group, who thought about taking a solitary stroll). The reverse was true of the logic questions: The group thinking about sex performed the best.
These findings were confirmed in a second test, in which participants were “primed” by having words related either to love or sex flashed in front of their eyes. (They were told it was an attention test.) Once again, those with sex on the brain did best at the logic questions, while those who had been reminded of love had superior results with the creative thinking questions.
“People process information in two fundamentally different ways: They focus on the forest, or they focus on the trees,” the researchers write. “Whereas the former illustrates a holistic or global processing style, the latter reflects a more detail-oriented or local processing style.
“These ways of perception have been closely linked to creative vs. analytic thought. Whereas global processing leads to creative thought, local processing facilitates analytic thinking.”
Romantic love, they note, “usually involves a long-terms goal or desire of staying together with a person … and thus contains a perspective on the distant future.” Thinking ahead that far entails making a creative leap, so it’s not surprising that one’s creative capacity would be stimulated.
In contrast, the researchers add, “Goals triggered by sexual desire are more specific in nature” and thus benefit from analytic thinking, such as coming up with “specific strategies of seduction.”
The researchers concede that feelings of love and lust can, and often do, overlap. But their data suggest the two impulses are independent “on a cognitive level,” and it is love, not sex, that gets the creative juices flowing.
This explains the relative paucity of Odes to a One-Night Stand.
Sign up for our free e-newsletter.
Are you on Facebook? Become our fan.
Follow us on Twitter.
word on the street
more in this section
Learning to Read When a School System Falters
Better Super Bowl Makes for Better Ads
Five Orcas, Five Slaves or Five Persons?
Overseas Troops Finally Get Fair Shot at Voting
Quake Rescues Reserve, Shakes Baja Fishing Town
Neglected Tropical Diseases Neglected No More?
Pirate Party Docks at Berlin’s Parliament
Children’s Books Increasingly Ignore Natural World
Conservation’s Earnest Message Could Use Levity
Traffic Solution: Make Drivers Less Lonely
also by this author
Tom JacobsStaff writer Tom Jacobs is a veteran journalist with more than 20 years experience at daily newspapers. He has served as a staff writer for The Lo...
Women Eye Dance Moves to Find Thrill SeekersHow to spot thrill-seeking men on the dance floor, “sweet” personalities in public, and bidding fever on eBay.
Morning People May Be More Creative in the AfternoonNew research finds problems that require a flash of illumination to solve are best approached during the time of day when you’re not at your peak.
Does Black History Need More Than a Month?The documentary “More Than a Month” asks: Does Black History Month still inspire reflection, or just Nike sales?
We’re Sorry: Not All Apologies Are ApologiesPoliticians take note: Research shows the fine line between claiming regret and taking responsibility.
Can a Bad Economy Save Your Marriage?Spouses who blame the economy for their woes, rather than pointing the finger at their partner, are more likely to be satisfied with their marriages.
Receive 1 year (6 issues) of our print magazine for just $14.95. Miller-McCune features polished, in-depth reports on research and solutions across the policy spectrum — from health care, education and energy to international affairs, poverty and the global economy. It's a must read for well-informed and solutions-driven individuals.
follow us on:
join our newsletter:
from the source
Various ways of assigning numbers to events, people, and actions is an ancient parlor game, but let’s not take it beyond that.
Researchers looking at how we fixate on threats uncover more evidence of a biological component to the red-blue divide.
Texas Republicans won Friday as the Supreme Court rejected a judicially drawn redistricting map, but not for the reasons you might think.
A report from The Sentencing Project argues that a primary driver for privatizing corrections isn’t really paying off.
The Research Works Act would prevent publicly funded research from automatically being available to the public for free. Private publishers back the bill, while open-access partisans are appalled.
