Ad for Idea Lobby blogger Emily Badger
Monday, February 13, 2012   |  Miller-McCune Homepage

close this window


We encourage you to share any articles or material you find on Miller-McCune.com with friends and colleagues. Please fill in the fields below with the name and e-mail address. Then fill in the same information for you. Miller-McCune will not keep any information about you or your friend, and the e-mail your friends receive will appear to have come from your e-mail address. The asterisk (*) denotes a required field.


From:





To:







Findings

May 5, 2010

Kids and TV: Maybe It’s Not an Idiot Box

It may seem unlikely, but new research says that increased TV watching alone isn’t likely to harm children’s thinking or schooling.


| PRINT | SHARE

Television has always been a menace.

Over decades, it allegedly has stifled creativity, stymied social development, inhibited academic achievement, and increased depression. At one time, a few of these charges made sense (and some still do), but now, with a hundreds of new-media options competing for eyeballs, many seem a bit quaint.

There’s one criticism that could be shelved entirely: More hours of TV watching means lower test scores for young children.

New research, headed by Abdul Munasib at Oklahoma State University, finds that the amount of television watched has little discernible impact on young children’s (age 5-10) academic achievement. The study’s findings come at a time when 36 percent of children in the U.S. have a TV set in their bedrooms and 40 percent of 3-month-olds regularly are plunked in front of television or DVD programming.

The research, to be published in the Economics of Education Review, culled data from the 1990-2002 survey rounds of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth and measured cognitive skills by using the mathematics and reading test scores from the Peabody Individual Achievement Test.

Using econometric analysis, researchers controlled for things like family structure, resources, parental control, health, urbanization level and many others among a cross section of children. While the study found a correlation between hours of television watched and lower test scores, once a variety of factors were controlled for, this relationship vanishes or “becomes too small to be of any real significance.”

While the study doesn’t suggest that watching TV is just as beneficial for children’s development as a variety of low-tech educational tools, it stresses that television — in effect — has become a scapegoat for children who perform poorly in school.

“If a child is not very interested in school work, [he/she] is likely to do poorly at school,” Munasib explained. “But clearly it would be wrong to conclude that watching more TV is what has ‘caused’ poor performance.” In short, if research compares test scores to hours of television watched, it may find a spurious link between the two.

The problem, outlined in the study, is that some the existing research on television viewing and academic achievement is “purely descriptive” in nature — meaning that, in general, the studies don’t control for other factors that may influence test scores.

This distinction is important, because research that makes headlines often points a critical finger squarely at television and not on a number of other factors that could influence test scores. Besides, Munasib isn’t so sure that children who watch less TV are therefore more likely to do better in school.

“It’s certainly true that those who are watching fewer hours of television have more time for studies,” Munasib wrote to Miller-McCune.com. “However, whether they actually do so is another issue; the extra time may simply be wasted in some other way that does not impact test scores in any positive way.”

His point: Television isn’t the only distraction that today’s children are likely to encounter when deciding whether or not to complete their homework. With more than 97 percent of adolescents (age 12-17) playing video games and becoming proficient at these systems at a younger and younger age, TV is just the tip of the idle-diversion iceberg.

Munasib’s research is not a broadside on the reams of scholarly reporting that insists television watching is bad for children, but it does inform legislators that “proactive policies to reduce television exposure” may not be the most effective way to increase children’s test scores and cognitive development.

“If the government passes legislation to encourage lower TV hours for children while everything else [in the school system] remains the same, it is unlikely to improve children’s test scores,” he wrote.

 

word on the street

Post your comment here

more in this section

Ad for Moving Picture column

also by this author

Erik Hayden

Former Miller-McCune Fellow Erik Hayden recently graduated from Pepperdine University with a B.A. in Political Science and a minor in Religion. He reg...

Prisoners of the States

A new book, “The Enemy In Our Hands,” looks at how America has treated — and mistreated — prisoners of war through history resonates in the age of terror.

Chinese Audiences Give Two Thumbs Up

Looking for lesson in cross-cultural psychology? Look no further than the different ways Americans and Chinese react to good, bad movies.

Today’s College Students Lacking in Empathy

A new meta-analysis finds that today’s college students have far less empathy than their forebearers.

Larger Schools May Breed Less Parental Involvement

A new analysis finds that parents are less likely to volunteer when their children attend larger schools.

The Anatomy of a Boycott

A look at who boycotts whom in the United States finds that those on the margins are the most likely to participate.

Receive 1 year (6 issues) of our print magazine for just $14.95. Miller-McCune features polished, in-depth reports on research and solutions across the policy spectrum — from health care, education and energy to international affairs, poverty and the global economy. It's a must read for well-informed and solutions-driven individuals.

Loading

follow us on:

join our newsletter:

from the source

Gender Wage Gap Skewed By Survey Flaws

The wage gap between the sexes in America has been closing much faster than anyone realized, but that’s tempered by learning it’s been much wider than measurements had shown.

‘Orcas as Slaves’ Argument Sinks

An effort to identify five performing orcas as slaves failed in part, argues one scholar, because there’s no legal precedent establishing them as persons.

House Puts Transportation in Partisan Crossfire

Transportation used to be one of the few guaranteed areas of agreement when ideology trumped pragmatism in D.C. But that’s no longer the case.

Better Super Bowl Makes for Better Ads

A lot of people say they watch the Super Bowl mostly for the ads. But it turns out a good game surrounding those ads makes them seem better.

Overseas Troops Finally Get Fair Shot at Voting

After decades of obstacles hindering the voting process, new laws will allow overseas and military voters to submit their votes in time for the 2012 election.