close this window
Kids and TV: Maybe It’s Not an Idiot Box
It may seem unlikely, but new research says that increased TV watching alone isn’t likely to harm children’s thinking or schooling.
Television has always been a menace.
Over decades, it allegedly has stifled creativity, stymied social development, inhibited academic achievement, and increased depression. At one time, a few of these charges made sense (and some still do), but now, with a hundreds of new-media options competing for eyeballs, many seem a bit quaint.
There’s one criticism that could be shelved entirely: More hours of TV watching means lower test scores for young children.
New research, headed by Abdul Munasib at Oklahoma State University, finds that the amount of television watched has little discernible impact on young children’s (age 5-10) academic achievement. The study’s findings come at a time when 36 percent of children in the U.S. have a TV set in their bedrooms and 40 percent of 3-month-olds regularly are plunked in front of television or DVD programming.
The research, to be published in the Economics of Education Review, culled data from the 1990-2002 survey rounds of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth and measured cognitive skills by using the mathematics and reading test scores from the Peabody Individual Achievement Test.
Using econometric analysis, researchers controlled for things like family structure, resources, parental control, health, urbanization level and many others among a cross section of children. While the study found a correlation between hours of television watched and lower test scores, once a variety of factors were controlled for, this relationship vanishes or “becomes too small to be of any real significance.”
While the study doesn’t suggest that watching TV is just as beneficial for children’s development as a variety of low-tech educational tools, it stresses that television — in effect — has become a scapegoat for children who perform poorly in school.
“If a child is not very interested in school work, [he/she] is likely to do poorly at school,” Munasib explained. “But clearly it would be wrong to conclude that watching more TV is what has ‘caused’ poor performance.” In short, if research compares test scores to hours of television watched, it may find a spurious link between the two.
The problem, outlined in the study, is that some the existing research on television viewing and academic achievement is “purely descriptive” in nature — meaning that, in general, the studies don’t control for other factors that may influence test scores.
This distinction is important, because research that makes headlines often points a critical finger squarely at television and not on a number of other factors that could influence test scores. Besides, Munasib isn’t so sure that children who watch less TV are therefore more likely to do better in school.
“It’s certainly true that those who are watching fewer hours of television have more time for studies,” Munasib wrote to Miller-McCune.com. “However, whether they actually do so is another issue; the extra time may simply be wasted in some other way that does not impact test scores in any positive way.”
His point: Television isn’t the only distraction that today’s children are likely to encounter when deciding whether or not to complete their homework. With more than 97 percent of adolescents (age 12-17) playing video games and becoming proficient at these systems at a younger and younger age, TV is just the tip of the idle-diversion iceberg.
Munasib’s research is not a broadside on the reams of scholarly reporting that insists television watching is bad for children, but it does inform legislators that “proactive policies to reduce television exposure” may not be the most effective way to increase children’s test scores and cognitive development.
“If the government passes legislation to encourage lower TV hours for children while everything else [in the school system] remains the same, it is unlikely to improve children’s test scores,” he wrote.
word on the street
more in this section
The Perceived Delicacy of the Female Conductor
Pressure to Conform Can Inspire Creativity
Children’s Books Increasingly Ignore Natural World
Morning People May Be More Creative in the Afternoon
Sex on the Brain Proves Costly for Men
Bitter About Your Life? Blame Facebook
‘Fair Trade’ Chocolate Perceived as Healthier
How the Unconscious Mind Boosts Creative Output
For Better Grades, Try Bach in the Background
College Football Wins Lower Guys’ GPA
also by this author
Prisoners of the StatesA new book, “The Enemy In Our Hands,” looks at how America has treated — and mistreated — prisoners of war through history resonates in the age of terror.
Chinese Audiences Give Two Thumbs UpLooking for lesson in cross-cultural psychology? Look no further than the different ways Americans and Chinese react to good, bad movies.
Today’s College Students Lacking in EmpathyA new meta-analysis finds that today’s college students have far less empathy than their forebearers.
Larger Schools May Breed Less Parental InvolvementA new analysis finds that parents are less likely to volunteer when their children attend larger schools.
The Anatomy of a BoycottA look at who boycotts whom in the United States finds that those on the margins are the most likely to participate.

Receive 1 year (6 issues) of our print magazine for just $14.95. Miller-McCune features polished, in-depth reports on research and solutions across the policy spectrum — from health care, education and energy to international affairs, poverty and the global economy. It's a must read for well-informed and solutions-driven individuals.

follow us on:
from the source

The wage gap between the sexes in America has been closing much faster than anyone realized, but that’s tempered by learning it’s been much wider than measurements had shown.

An effort to identify five performing orcas as slaves failed in part, argues one scholar, because there’s no legal precedent establishing them as persons.

Transportation used to be one of the few guaranteed areas of agreement when ideology trumped pragmatism in D.C. But that’s no longer the case.

A lot of people say they watch the Super Bowl mostly for the ads. But it turns out a good game surrounding those ads makes them seem better.

After decades of obstacles hindering the voting process, new laws will allow overseas and military voters to submit their votes in time for the 2012 election.







