close this window
Female Teachers Add to Students’ Math Anxiety
Highly math-anxious female teachers may lead girls to conform to the stereotype that, when it comes to math, they just can’t compete with the boys.
In spite of the multitude of research indicating otherwise, the assumption that boys are biologically better at math than girls is alive and well at schools across the nation. And a new study indicates that when female teachers believe the stereotype, they pass their own mathematical anxiety on to the girls in their classes.
While the perpetuation of the idea is troubling, the implications are more so: The girls who believe their gender possesses inferior math skills do significantly worse in the subject than the girls who don’t.
Researchers at the University of Chicago conducted a yearlong study of 17 first- and second-grade teachers and their classes. They found that a female teacher’s math anxiety did not affect boys’ performance — but it did affect girls’ math achievement.
Their results, published in the Jan. 11 issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, indicate that a highly math-anxious female teacher may lead girls to conform to the stereotype that, when it comes to math, they just can’t compete with the boys.
The findings are particularly worrisome since women make up more than 90 percent of elementary school teachers in the United States. Teaching certificates require very little mathematical knowledge or preparation, and research has shown that students majoring in elementary education have higher rates of math anxiety and lower proficiency rates in it than other college majors.
To determine the effects of a teacher’s math anxiety on her students, researchers tested individual students’ mathematical achievement and gender stereotypes at both the beginning and the end of the school year. They also assessed each teacher’s level of anxiety.
After hearing gender-neutral stories about students who were good at math and good at reading, students were asked to draw a picture of a child who was good at each subject. The researchers used the drawings (Did Susie draw a boy or a girl as the good-at-math student?) to assess gender stereotypes.
When school started in the fall, student math achievement wasn’t related to their teachers’ feelings about math. But by the end of the school year, the more anxious a teacher was about the subject, the more likely girls — but not boys — in her class had adopted the view that “boys are good at math and girls are good at reading.”
The girls who believed the stereotype scored six points lower in math achievement than either the boys or the girls who hadn’t developed an opinion on it. This suggests that the lack of women in math- and science-intensive fields like engineering needs to be addressed much earlier in the game than initiatives providing college scholarships for women going into engineering or chemistry.
The authors of the study echo the sentiments of Leon Botstein, suggesting that elementary school teacher preparation programs require more math in their curricula and address teacher uncertainties about the subject.
However, they leave untouched (perhaps wisely) the “multiculturalism-to-math ratio” debate.
Sign up for our free e-newsletter.
Are you on Facebook? Become our fan.
Follow us on Twitter.
word on the street
more in this section
Learning to Read When a School System Falters
No Debate: Kids Can Learn By Arguing
One Laptop Per Child Redux
College Football Wins Lower Guys’ GPA
If LSU Cuts Football, Academia Can Panic
Despite Bad Marks, For-Profit Colleges Still Passing
Poor Neighborhoods Mean Fewer High School Grads
Music Training Enhances Children’s Verbal Intelligence
Innovation Must Get in Line for Academic Funding
‘Wither’ the Liberal Arts College?
also by this author
Elisabeth BestFormer Miller-McCune Fellow Elisabeth Best is currently pursuing a Masters of Pacific International Affairs at the University of California, San Diego...
Lessons From China and India’s Newspaper BoomHow the print media in China and India are succeeding — and what America’s ailing journalism industry might learn from them.
Making Seed Aid BlossomThe quake in Haiti and floods in Pakistan highlight that the multimillion-dollar emergency seed aid industry is in need of a makeover.
When Migrant Workers Return HomeThousands of Latin-American migrants come to work in the United States every year, legally and illegally. But does their time in the U.S. help or hurt them when they return to their home countries?
Public Schools: An Untapped Recreational ResourceResearchers suggest limiting liability issues to make playgrounds and other recreation areas on school grounds accessible as a cost-effective way to promote public health.
Recreating the Creative Industry in New OrleansIn the wake of Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans has been rebounding slowly. Five years after the disaster, researchers suggest that the city promote its entertainment industry as a development strategy.
Receive 1 year (6 issues) of our print magazine for just $14.95. Miller-McCune features polished, in-depth reports on research and solutions across the policy spectrum — from health care, education and energy to international affairs, poverty and the global economy. It's a must read for well-informed and solutions-driven individuals.
follow us on:
join our newsletter:
from the source
The wage gap between the sexes in America has been closing much faster than anyone realized, but that’s tempered by learning it’s been much wider than measurements had shown.
An effort to identify five performing orcas as slaves failed in part, argues one scholar, because there’s no legal precedent establishing them as persons.
New research finds listeners judge symphonic music differently when they’re told the conductor is a woman.
Transportation used to be one of the few guaranteed areas of agreement when ideology trumped pragmatism in D.C. But that’s no longer the case.
New research suggests less-creative people do more innovative thinking when they are told individualism is the norm, and instructed to conform.
