Ad for Idea Lobby blogger Emily Badger
Monday, February 13, 2012   |  Miller-McCune Homepage

close this window


We encourage you to share any articles or material you find on Miller-McCune.com with friends and colleagues. Please fill in the fields below with the name and e-mail address. Then fill in the same information for you. Miller-McCune will not keep any information about you or your friend, and the e-mail your friends receive will appear to have come from your e-mail address. The asterisk (*) denotes a required field.


From:





To:







Research in Summary

March 5, 2010

Death and the Academy Award Winner

Oscar winners may live longer lives than their peers. Or perhaps shorter ones.


| PRINT | SHARE

Do Oscar winners live longer than their peers? The answer is as murky as bad cinematography. As Dr. Donald Redelmeier noted in the Annals of Internal Medicine in 2001, social status is a “consistent, powerful and widespread determinant of death rates.”

So, at least in theory, the status conferred by the golden statuette could contribute to a recipient’s longevity. Redelmeier and Sheldon Singh compared the mortality rates of the 762 actors and actresses who had received nominations up to that point, and compared them with another cast member of the same gender who was in the same film and “born in the same era.”

They found life expectancy was 3.9 years longer for Academy Award winners than for their less-recognized counterparts.

In 2005, the same journal published a rebuttal by four researchers, who criticized the original authors’ statistical methodology. They contended, reasonably enough, that if we’re asking whether an Oscar increases one’s status and lengthens one’s life, one should compare the number of years he or she lives after winning the award at (say) age 50 to the number of years an Oscarless colleague lives after age 50.


Nothing stirs debates over movies like the Academy Awards. For more on the studies of Oscar, check out these stories when they’re released in the coming days:
Does an Academy Award Really Denote Quality? (available now)
Predicting Oscars for Bigelow, Bridges, Bullock (available now)
Oscar Winners Should Thank Their Economist (March 6)


Recalculating the numbers in that way, the scholars, led by Marie-Pierre Sylvestre, determined that the Oscar winners’ survival advantage “was closer to one year, and was not statistically significant.”

If there is a longevity advantage for actors, it apparently doesn’t extend to screenwriters. Redelmeier and Singh crunched the numbers for all 850 scribes nominated for an Oscar through the year 2000. Writing in the British Medical Journal, they determined that the life expectancy of Academy Award winners was 3.6 years shorter than for nominees.

“This paradox is not easily explained,” they conceded. “It might reflect the unusual lifestyles of writers, where success is not linked to exemplary conduct or control.”

As it is for, umm, actors?

Sign up for our free e-newsletter.

Are you on Facebook? Become our fan.

Follow us on Twitter.

Add our news to your site.

 

word on the street

Post your comment here

more in this section

also by this author

Tom Jacobs

Staff writer Tom Jacobs is a veteran journalist with more than 20 years experience at daily newspapers. He has served as a staff writer for The Lo...

The Perceived Delicacy of the Female Conductor

New research finds listeners judge symphonic music differently when they’re told the conductor is a woman.

Pressure to Conform Can Inspire Creativity

New research suggests less-creative people do more innovative thinking when they are told individualism is the norm, and instructed to conform.

Children’s Books Increasingly Ignore Natural World

A survey of award-winning children’s picture books from 1938 to 2008 suggests our increasing estrangement from the natural environment.

Women Eye Dance Moves to Find Thrill Seekers

How to spot thrill-seeking men on the dance floor, “sweet” personalities in public, and bidding fever on eBay.

Morning People May Be More Creative in the Afternoon

New research finds problems that require a flash of illumination to solve are best approached during the time of day when you’re not at your peak.

Receive 1 year (6 issues) of our print magazine for just $14.95. Miller-McCune features polished, in-depth reports on research and solutions across the policy spectrum — from health care, education and energy to international affairs, poverty and the global economy. It's a must read for well-informed and solutions-driven individuals.

Loading

follow us on:

join our newsletter:

from the source

Gender Wage Gap Skewed By Survey Flaws

The wage gap between the sexes in America has been closing much faster than anyone realized, but that’s tempered by learning it’s been much wider than measurements had shown.

‘Orcas as Slaves’ Argument Sinks

An effort to identify five performing orcas as slaves failed in part, argues one scholar, because there’s no legal precedent establishing them as persons.

House Puts Transportation in Partisan Crossfire

Transportation used to be one of the few guaranteed areas of agreement when ideology trumped pragmatism in D.C. But that’s no longer the case.

Better Super Bowl Makes for Better Ads

A lot of people say they watch the Super Bowl mostly for the ads. But it turns out a good game surrounding those ads makes them seem better.

Overseas Troops Finally Get Fair Shot at Voting

After decades of obstacles hindering the voting process, new laws will allow overseas and military voters to submit their votes in time for the 2012 election.