This Might Explain Mickey’s Vocal Range
If you’ve ever found yourself wondering, ‘Why can’t mice talk?’ this is the study (and, let’s face it, the blog) for you.
-
AnswerTips are small bubbles of information triggered by double-clicking any word on an AnswerTips-enabled page.
|
Print |
E-mail | - Permalink |
- Text Size decrease increase
Wolfgang Enard of the Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology believes he has found the genetic discrepancy in mice and humans that accounts for speech and language.
His team is studying the genomic differences that differentiate humans from their primate ancestors. When the human lineage split from chimpanzees, two amino acids were changed in the gene FOXP2 — a change that is thought to be associated with crucial aspects of speaking and understanding language.
“Changes in FOXP2 occurred over the course of human evolution and are the best candidates for genetic changes that might explain why we can speak,” said Enard in a press release announcing his findings, which were published in the May 29 edition of the journal Cell. “The challenge is to study it functionally.”
But, of course, that can’t be done in people or chimps. So the researchers introduced those genetic changes into the FOXP2 gene of mice, which is essentially identical to that of chimps (and therefore a good model to study the human version).
The research shows that mice bearing the “humanized gene” develop changes in brain circuitry that have been previously linked to speech. Another tantalizing clue: The genetically altered mouse pups — who appeared to be generally healthy — make different ultrasonic vocalizations when placed outside the comfort of their mothers’ nests.
The researchers write that it will now be important to further explore the basis of the gene’s impacts and possible relationship the evolution of humans and apes.
“More studies will be needed to clarify to what extent mouse vocalizations can model aspects of human speech evolution,” they write. “We are confident that concerted studies of mice, humans and other primates will eventually clarify if this is the case.”
Sign up for our free e-newsletter.
Are you on Facebook? Become our fan.
Follow us on Twitter.
Post A Comment
We want your feedback! You can remain anonymous, but we'd prefer that you log in or sign up first. Trenchant and witty are cool but all comments are subject to approval/removal. Want more space than a little box? Write for us!
Written By:Matt Palmquist
A graduate of Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism, Matt Palmquist, a former Miller-McCune staff writer, began his career at daily newspapers such as The Oregonian and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. In 2001, he became a staff writer at the SF Weekly in San Francisco, where he won several local and national awards. He also wrote a humorous current affairs column called "The Apologist," which he continued upon leaving the Weekly and beginning a freelance career.
Also By This Author
- 1 Triumph of the Cyborg Composer
- 2 The Down Side of Self-Control
- 3 Wonking Week: Art, Phosphorus and the Nanny State
- 4 The History of Mardi Gras Beadwhores
- 5 Think on This: Meditation May Protect Your Brain
- 6 The Story of P(ee)
- 7 Unmasking Mardi Gras Deviants
- 8 Simply Rwandan
- 9 Snowmaggedon Backs All Climate Change Views
- 10 The Rational Ruffian: Why Crime Pays

