close this window
Knowledge the Most Important Renewable Resource
Tom Price is blogging live from the American Association for the Advancement of Science’s public policy conference for Miller-McCune.com.
Investing in scientific research can stimulate the economy in the short term, build a sustainable economy for the long term and address major problems such as poverty and global warming.
That optimistic view came from an international panel of science leaders during the American Association for the Advancement of Science’s annual public policy conference today.
“Ideas propel prosperity,” said Gary Goodyear, Canada’s minister of state for science and technology. Unlike many fuels, “knowledge is endlessly renewable,” he said, and it “makes exponential progress possible.
“Investment in science, technology and innovation is particularly important during economic tough times,” he said. Sustained investment is “security against tough economic times” in the long run.
Canada’s current stimulus spending is part of a long-term science and technology strategy, he said. The strategy is designed to give his country an “entrepreneurial advantage,” a “knowledge advantage,” and a “people advantage” in the form of a highly skilled workforce, he added.
A portion of the Canadian science funding addresses global warming through research into hydrogen fuel cells, energy-efficient buildings, capturing carbon from fossil fuels and generating power from the wind, sun, tides and vegetation. Canada is upgrading educational facilities, laboratories and scientific equipment. Another program aims to help small businesses become more competitive through innovation. The government is funding university research chairs for 20 top scientists from around the world who will do their work in Canada. And it’s offering $50,000-a-year graduate student stipends to select international and Canadian students for study at Canadian universities.
“Canada wants the best, and we’re willing to do what it takes to get them,” Goodyear explained.
Many governments are responding to the recession by increasing support for research and development, according to Cathleen Campbell, president and chief executive officer of the U.S. Civilian Research and Development Foundation.
Even governments in poor countries such as Ghana and Uganda recognize science’s value, said Alfred Watkins, the World Bank’s science and technology program coordinator. Unfortunately, in many developing countries, scientists have little interaction with government decision makers, he added. And they need assistance from the developed world.
The bank is helping such countries build scientific infrastructure, Watkins said. Campbell said her foundation is teaching proper scientific procedures to scientists in developing countries — such as appropriate treatment of human research subjects, research ethics and research management.
Efforts to build science in developing countries need to be designed for specific countries’ specific circumstances, she said, explaining that “there’s no ‘one size fits all’ here.”
Despite many governments’ support for science, Watkins said, scientists still need to sell themselves to the broader public.
“Too many people tend to think of science as something very abstract, something completely removed from everyday problem-solving,” he explained. “They don’t realize science and technology are about clean water, food security and transportation systems.”
That’s partly because research doesn’t produce the quick results much of the general public prefers, said James Wilsdon, director of the Royal Society’s Science Policy Centre in the United Kingdom.
“If you fund great scientists and leave them alone to do great science, (results) will come,” Wilsdon said, but not necessarily in a short time.
Sign up for our free e-newsletter.
Are you on Facebook? Become our fan.
Follow us on Twitter.
word on the street
more in this section
EarthScope: A Seismic Shift in Data Gathering
Why Robot Maids Won’t Do the Dishes
20,000 Robots Under the Sea
San Francisco Bay Model Is Flush With Life
Teens Weigh Ethical Animal Research Dilemmas
Animal Research’s Changing Equation
Feds Put Chimp Experiments in Cage
Scientists Deflated by Obama’s Policy Decisions
Engaging Iran Through Vaccine Diplomacy
Does This Make My Antenna Look Big?
also by this author
Crafting Policy to Bridge the Red-Blue DivideThe Bipartisan Policy Center, a think tank founded four years ago by four former U.S Senate majority leaders, works to overcome political polarization.
State Budget Cuts Hurting Quality of ResearchWhile the federal component of research funding remains federal, state budget cuts threaten U.S. research quality, educators say. …
Beware of Science as Political Veneer“Scientization of politics,” not just politicization of science, weakens scientific integrity.
U.S. Challenged for High-Tech Global LeadershipA mixed picture emerges as science organizations examine the U.S. lead in innovation and where that lead is headed.
A Primer on Media in the 21st Century: Part IIIt’s been said that the so-called new media are driving a stake into the heart of the traditional dead-tree model. A recent Project for Excellence in Journalism report shows that while new media are growing in popularity, old-school reportage is still important and relevant.

Receive 1 year (6 issues) of our print magazine for just $14.95. Miller-McCune features polished, in-depth reports on research and solutions across the policy spectrum — from health care, education and energy to international affairs, poverty and the global economy. It's a must read for well-informed and solutions-driven individuals.

follow us on:
from the source

The wage gap between the sexes in America has been closing much faster than anyone realized, but that’s tempered by learning it’s been much wider than measurements had shown.

An effort to identify five performing orcas as slaves failed in part, argues one scholar, because there’s no legal precedent establishing them as persons.

New research finds listeners judge symphonic music differently when they’re told the conductor is a woman.

Transportation used to be one of the few guaranteed areas of agreement when ideology trumped pragmatism in D.C. But that’s no longer the case.

New research suggests less-creative people do more innovative thinking when they are told individualism is the norm, and instructed to conform.







