Debate on Religion and Happiness
The cover story of the June/July issue of Miller-McCune magazine looks at whether it is the government’s role to try to make its citizens happier — a notion that has gained far more traction in Europe than in the U.S. Coincidentally, an interesting debate has been taking place in the blogosphere over the past couple of days about religion and happiness — and again, Europeans and Americans seem to be coming to different conclusions.
-
AnswerTips are small bubbles of information triggered by double-clicking any word on an AnswerTips-enabled page.
|
Print |
E-mail | - Permalink |
- Text Size decrease increase
The discussion began with the Cato Institute’s Will Wilkinson, who commented on his blog about his ongoing argument with Arthur Brooks, a professor of business and government policy at Syracuse University and author of the book Gross National Happiness. Wilkinson concedes Brooks’ basic point that in the United States, “religious participation is positively correlated with higher levels of self-reported happiness.”
But he adds that, if you take an international perspective, the picture becomes much murkier. Wilkinson notes that “countries with some of the lowest levels of religious participation in the world, such as Denmark, Norway or Finland, show up again and again in international rankings as some of the world’s happiest places, usually ahead of the U.S.”
Ross Douthat of TheAtlantic.com picked up on this idea, asserting that he suspects “the benefits of belonging to a religious community are greater in the U.S. than in Europe in part because our welfare state is smaller, and religious participation provides both tangible and intangible forms of security that are more valuable in a society where the free market is more freewheeling and the welfare state weaker. If you’re a Christian who prefers the American model, you might say that the Europeans use government as a substitute for God; if you prefer
Europe’s path to modernity, you’d probably say something about Americans clinging to churchgoing because it’s the only protection available against the harsh brutality of our jungle capitalism.”
Kevin Drum of the Washington Monthly adds this thought: “Europe has suffered through centuries of devastating religious wars that didn’t end until fairly recently. If you live in Western Europe, there’s a pretty good chance that you associate strong religiosity with death, destruction and massive societal grief, not with church bake sales. So whatever you think of religion itself, seeing the end of religious wars, religious terrorism and massive state-sponsored religious bigotry is almost bound to make you happy. You’d have to be almost literally crazy not to be happier in today’s secular Europe than in yesterday’s religious Europe.”
So, to bring the discussion back to Ryan Blitstein’s Miller-McCune article: Perhaps European governments are more intrigued by the notion of promoting happiness because, unlike ourselves, they have given up the belief that religion can successfully serve that role. Hundreds of years of warfare and an inquisition or two will do that to you.
Post A Comment
We want your feedback! You can remain anonymous, but we'd prefer that you log in or sign up first. Trenchant and witty are cool but all comments are subject to approval/removal. Want more space than a little box? Write for us!
Comments
Religions are a form of power. They can be used to change the minds of large amounts of people. This is why China has banned all forms of organized religion (you are allowed to pray in your own home, but if you attempt to organize a group of people, you will be arrested or "re-educated"). Socialist countries like Denmark and Sweden want to stamp this stuff out because it competes with the state. The left also hates religion because it comprises of people that have a different set of beliefs. This is why you see very little religion in countries like Denmark, Finland, and Sweden. There is no right in these countries, only shades of left.I don't necessary believe in any of the major religions, but they are not a bad thing. They teach people to respect and love one another.The only way to get rid of religion in this country would be to ban it, which I don't think will happen anytime soon because the freedom of religion is one of our rights.I would also like to see how they define happiness, because many times, ignorance is bliss. In the United States, we have less government control and interference, which means more freedom. People in Sweden have no idea what this freedom is even like, because they have no choice. I will not be happier with more taxes and reliance on the government (which ultimately means less choice and freedom).I saw an interview once with some peasants in North Korea. Not only were they very happy, but they felt that the leader was a god. If they interview everyone in the country, and the majority are happy, Should we then conclude that this form of government creates happier citizens?
Written By:Tom Jacobs
Tom Jacobs is a veteran journalist with more than 20 years experience at daily newspapers. He has served as a staff writer for The Los Angeles Daily News and the Santa Barbara News-Press. His work has also appeared in The Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune and Ventura County Star.
Also By This Author
- 1 Triumph of the Cyborg Composer
- 2 The Down Side of Self-Control
- 3 Wonking Week: Art, Phosphorus and the Nanny State
- 4 The History of Mardi Gras Beadwhores
- 5 Think on This: Meditation May Protect Your Brain
- 6 The Story of P(ee)
- 7 Unmasking Mardi Gras Deviants
- 8 Simply Rwandan
- 9 Snowmaggedon Backs All Climate Change Views
- 10 The Rational Ruffian: Why Crime Pays

