The Best Things in Life are Z’s
Sara Mednick pits the world’s No. 1 stimulant against napping in a test of memory.
It’s 1:30 p.m., post-lunch, and your eyelids are feeling heavy. Your boss called you this morning and needed you to do something … but what was it? Your brain may be asking for a rest, but you’ll likely reach for stimulation instead — about 90 percent of Americans use caffeine every day.
Though it should make you feel more awake, caffeine probably does nothing to help you recall what was said this morning. A new study, just published in the journal Behavioural Brain Research, shows that an hour of shut-eye is a far more effective restorer of memory than a cup of coffee.
The study’s main author, Sara Mednick, is a professor of psychiatry at the University of California, San Diego. In 2002, she tested visual perception in a group of college students, finding that even in well-rested individuals the ability to discern shapes declines steadily throughout the day. A 30-minute afternoon nap halts further deterioration, however, and a 60-minute nap actually restores people to their morning capacity.
Such findings led her to become an ardent nap advocate: She wrote a general-interest book called Take a Nap! Change Your Life and moonlights as a corporate nap consultant.
Of course, modern worker bees rarely have the luxury of an hourlong midday doze. Various studies have verified that in the right dose — which varies from person to person — caffeine enhances alertness and concentration. But its effects, if any, on higher cognitive functions like learning and memory are less clear.
For Mednick’s experiment, her team recruited a group of undergrads and divided them into three groups — caffeine, nap and placebo. Each group would be tested on three different facets of memory — verbal, motor and perceptual. After a full night’s rest, testing began: For the verbal task, subjects listened to a list of unrelated words. The motor task measured the accuracy of their fingers tapping a specific sequence on a keyboard. For the perceptual task, they were judged by the speed at which they could identify the orientation of bars on a screen.
At midday, one group was treated to a 60- to 90-minute nap, while the others took a placebo or caffeine pill — at 200 milligrams, about the same as a regular Dunkin’ Donuts coffee. Seven hours after the first morning session, subjects were retested on what they had learned. For Mednick, the most striking result was in the verbal area — nappers significantly outperformed the placebo and caffeine groups in the number of words they could recall. For motor accuracy, nap and placebo beat caffeine; for perceptual quickness, nap and caffeine beat placebo.
Mednick believes her results reflect the fact that verbal, motor and perceptual memory each involves a different region of the brain. Recalling a list of words — or specific instructions from a boss or driving directions — engages the hippocampus, a region that recharges during the period of deep sleep called stage 4, or “slow wave sleep.” This kind of deliberate, explicit learning therefore benefits most from a generous midday nap.
Perceptual memory, on the other hand, is innate — through repeated exposure, the visual system learns to recognize and respond without conscious thought. Radiologists, for example, tap into their perceptual memory to identify tumors in an X-ray.
Motor memory lies somewhere in between — at first learning is deliberate but soon feels as intuitive as riding a bicycle. In this area, Mednick also noted an increased benefit from napping and evidence of overstimulation in the declining accuracy of the caffeinated finger-tappers.
Whether caffeine adversely affects any type of memory remains an open question —other researchers believe its effects are neutral except in sleep-deprived individuals, where it can be a boon.
Nonetheless, Mednick’s lesson is clear: For a midday memory boost, nap clearly trumps caffeine. “It’s an investment of time to take a 60-minute nap, though if you think of it, the time difference between going to Starbucks for a coffee may be only half an hour,” she said. “If there’s a chance of flagging, I’d rather take a nap.”
Sign up for our free e-newsletter.
Are you on Facebook? Click here to become our fan.
We encourage you to share any articles or material you find on Miller-McCune.com with friends and colleagues. Please fill in the fields below with the name and e-mail address, separating multiple addresses with semi-colons (;). Then fill in the same information for you. Miller-McCune will not keep any information about you or your friend, and the e-mail your friends receive will appear to have come from your e-mail address. The asterisk (*) denotes a required field.
Post A Comment
We want your feedback but you must be logged in first.
Trenchant and snarky are cool but all comments are subject to approval/removal.
Want more space than a little box? Write for us!
Written By:Lindsey McCormack
Lindsey McCormack grew up north of Boston, learning from an early age to appreciate fried clams and cold oceans. She attended Harvard College, where she majored in Latin American history and literature, and studied for a year…
Also By This Author
- 1 Deep Throat Meets Data Mining
- 2 Doctor: Vets Need More Basic Training
- 3 Attacking Alzheimer’s with a…
- 4 The Man Who Bridges Troubled Waters
- 5 Under Bush, Science Learned It…
- 6 Brain Injuries Linked to Spirituality
- 7 America’s Mental Health (Care)…
- 8 The VA Brush-Off
- 9 Cautious Optimism for Obama’s…
- 10 Graphic Anti-Meth Ads Ineffective



Comments