Ovaries, Testes Age In Different Ways
Mighty aging differences account for some of his might?Mighty Mouse animation by Carlo Vinci
Researchers at the National Institute on Aging in Baltimore have tacked one of the key questions in their field: Do reproductive organs age in the same way as other body organs? The question is especially important since more women in developed countries are postponing childbirth until later in life.
The researchers found that aging does lead to large changes in the gene activity in the ovaries of mice, but only limited changes in testes, according to the study published in BMC Biology. Indeed, the study showed that ovaries age in a much different way from testes. Some of the aging effects were reversed when the mice were put on a lifespan-extending calorie-restricted diet, but the changes in somatic organs were widespread, while gonad-specific genes were only slightly impacted.
The researchers suggest that changes in ovaries could be influenced by the way the tissue composition of ovaries changes as females age and ovulation ceases.
The researchers also found that calorie restriction in females reduced the expression of genes involved in metabolism and follicle growth, which seems to be in line with the consensus belief that calorie restriction causes a reduction in energy for reproduction and an increase in general body maintenance and repair. However, male mice on the same diet did not appear to sacrifice reproductive function, suggesting an evolutionary difference between males and females when confronting a food shortage.
"This poses an interesting question," the researchers write. "Is an additional explanation required to account for the difference between males and females in terms of evolutionary basis of aging? For example, it is conceivable that under (calorie restriction) conditions a need to shut down reproductive function is much greater in females than in males, because the lives of both mother and fetus are at a risk in pregnant females? Some theories of aging may need to be reexamined in the light of new data reported in this paper."
We encourage you to share any articles or material you find on Miller-McCune.com with friends and colleagues. Please fill in the fields below with the name and e-mail address, separating multiple addresses with semi-colons (;). Then fill in the same information for you. Miller-McCune will not keep any information about you or your friend, and the e-mail your friends receive will appear to have come from your e-mail address. The asterisk (*) denotes a required field.
Post A Comment
We want your feedback but you must be logged in first.
Trenchant and snarky are cool but all comments are subject to approval/removal.
Want more space than a little box? Write for us!
Also By This Author
- 1 Deep Throat Meets Data Mining
- 2 Doctor: Vets Need More Basic Training
- 3 Attacking Alzheimer’s with a…
- 4 The Man Who Bridges Troubled Waters
- 5 Under Bush, Science Learned It…
- 6 Brain Injuries Linked to Spirituality
- 7 America’s Mental Health (Care)…
- 8 The VA Brush-Off
- 9 Cautious Optimism for Obama’s…
- 10 Graphic Anti-Meth Ads Ineffective




Comments